Skip to main content

Full text of "Thoughts on the money and exchanges of Lower Canada"

See other formats


THE  UNIVERSITY 

OF  ILLINOIS 

LIBRARY 

^875 
v3j 


^ 


THOUGHTS  ^ 


ON   THE 


MONEY    AND    EXCHANGES 


OF 


LOWER    CANADA 


BY    HENRY    S.    CHAPMAN, 

(aCTIIOR   of   a    statistical    sketch  of  tub  corn    trade  of  lover    CANADA.) 


MONTREAL: 
PRINTED  AT  THE  MONTREAL  GAZETTE  OFFICE, 

2.'>f    NOTRE    DAME    STREVT. 

1832. 


TO 
SAMUEL  REVANS 

AMD 

JOHN  W.  DUNSCOMB,  Esquires, 

THE  FOLLOWING  PAGES, 

THE  RECORD  OF  OUR  CONVERSATIONS  ON 

THE    SUBJECT    TREATED   OF, 

ARE  DEDICATED, 

BV  THEIR  SINCERE  FRIEND 

THE  AUTHOR. 


Qlf.bec,  Scpfembcr,  1832. 


35a'J6i 


ERRATA. 

Owing  to  the  circumstance  of  the  Author  residing  at  a  distance  from  the  Pub. 
lislier,  the  following  errors  have  crept  in  : — 

Page  19,  line  6,  for  "  lead"  read  '<  leads." 

26,  "  12,  after  the  ward  "  conversion,"  the  comma  should  be  a  semicolon, 

and  after  "  conveyance"  the  semicolon  should  be  a  comma. 
23,  "  19,  for  (G)  rcarf  (C). 

30,  **     7  from  bottom,  for  ''come"  read  "came." 

31,  "  24,  for  ''  106,061"  read  "  156,061." 
34,  ♦'     3  from  bottom,  for  1  3-6  read  1  3-8. 

37,  «    7  ditto,        for '*  these  .sums"  reai '*  their  sum," 

42,  "  13         ditto,       for  "substract"  rcarf"  subtract." 

43,  "  25,  for  "  and  the  evidence"  read  "  to  the  evidence." 

44,  in  the  note  for  "  chapter  6"  rend  4. 

45,  line  27,  for  "  depreciate"  read  "  depreciation." 

46,  «'  7,  for  '*  emmigration"  read  "immigration." 

8  from  bottom,  after  the  word  "  awkward"  insert  "  for." 
48,  «  10       ditto,       {or  "its"  read  "their." 
51,  <<  12       ditto,       for  <«  depreciate,"  rearf  "depreciation." 
53,  in  the  list  of  the  Appendix,  line  18  to  be  struck  out ;  E,  No.  4,  not  hav. 
ing  been  inserted.   No.    5   is   consequently  marked  4,  and  the 
Sumraar,y  5 


T  H  O  U  G  II  T  S 


MONEY  AND  EXCHANGES 


LOWER  CANADA. 


INTRODUCTION. 

It  will  be  recollected,  that  in  the  early  part  of  the  year 
1830, — ill  consequence  of  a  passage  in  the  speech  of  Sir 
James  Kempt,  having  reference  to  the  state  of  the  Cur- 
rency,— both  houses  of  the  Provincial  Legislature  appointed 
Committees  to  hear  evidence  on,  and  inquire  into  the  mone- 
tary system  of  Lower  Canada. 

These  Committees  reported  tlie  results  of  their  labours, 
but,  unfortunately,  little  has  been  practically  edected 
thereby.  On  examining  the  reports,  this  will  not  be  deemed 
surprising.  The  facts  collected  are  few  in  number,  and  no 
important  conclusions  are  drawn  from  them.  We  learn, 
that  certain  coins  pass  current  in  Lower  Canada  at  rates 
above  their  value;  the  evil  is  duly  expatiated  upon;  but 
accompanied  only  by  a  feeble  recommendation  "  that  they 
"  should  be  called  in  at  the  public  expense,  under  safe- 
"  guards  against  their  not  having  been  introduced  into  the 
"  Province  in  order  to  profit  by  such  deterioration."*  A\  hat 
safeguards  arc  sufficient  is  not  pointed  out,  though  it  was 
a  question  evidently  within  the  province  of  both  Commit- 
tees ;  in  fact,  generally,  the  Committees  content  themselves 
with  declaring,  that  it  is  advisable  to  do  what  they  them- 
selves were  expressly  appointed  to  do,  and  so  putting  oflT, 
sine  die^  the  business  of  inquiry.  ^Ve  are  further  told  that 
the  weight  and  purity  of  the  Spanish  dollar,  having  been 
reduced,  our  par  of  exchange  is  no  longer  correct ;  but, 


•  Council't.  Report,  p.igc  12,  Svo.  cd. 


although  much  evidence  was  collected,  no  attempt  was 
made  to  set  the  public  right  on  the  point.  It  is  true 
the  evidence  was  contradictory ;  one  witness  stating  the 
dollar  to  be  worth  4s.  Id.  to  4s.  2d.,  another  4s.  3d.,  a 
third  4s.  4d.,  and  a  fourth  that  it  would  require  £115i-3 
currency  to  make  £100  sterling — thus  making  the  dollar 
worth  4s.  3|d  .58.  No  attempt  was  made  to  establish, 
by  a  reference  to  general  principles,  which, — if  any, — of 
the  above  rates  is  correct,  though  there  is  no  principle 
of  the  science,  within  whose  province  such  questions  come, 
better, — more  fairly  and  fully  establislied  than  that  which 
would  have  led, — and  by  no  very  intricate  road  either, — to 
the  truth. 

Hence  it  will  appear  that  the  "Lower  Canadian  Cur- 
rency question"  stands  nearly  as  it  did  before  the  Com- 
mittees sat.  Its  deranged  state  is  still  complained  of,  but  the 
extent  and  direction  of  that  derangement  is,  as  yet,  wholly 
undetermined  and  but  vaguely  conceived.  These  points  it 
will  be  the  object  of  this  paper  to  clear  up ;  the  evidence 
collected  by  the  Committees,  especially  the  documentary 
pari,  some  of  which  appears  valuable,  will  be  submitted  to 
a  careful  examination  ;  and  after  adding  such  further  evi- 
dence as  I  can  command,  and  which  may  tend  to  elucidate 
the  inquiry,  I  shall  endeavour  to  point  out  a  remedy  for 
the  acknowledged  evils,  of  easy  practical  application. 

CHAPTER  I. 

On  the  state  of  the  Coins  in  circulation. 

As  the  actual  state  of  the  coins  in  circulation  in  the  Pro- 
vince forms  no  inconsiderable  portion  of  the  inquiries  of 
both  Committees,  let  us,  without  preface,  direct  our  atten- 
tion thereto. 

I  need  scarcely  remind  the  reader,  that  the  integer  of  ac- 
count in  Canada  is  the  £  currency  consisting  of  four  Span- 
ish dollars,  its  subdivisions  being  as  those  of  British  money, 
into  shillings  and  pence;  the  dollar,  consequently,  being 
called  five  shillings. 

The  coins  chietly  met  with  in  circulation  are  as  follows : — 
Spanish  dollars,  and  a  few  American,  5s., — American  half 
dollars,  and  a  few  Spanish,  2s.  6d., — Spanish  and  American 
quarter  dollars.  Is.  3d., — Spanish  one  eighth  ditto,  7|d., — • 
Spanish  one-sixteenth  ditto,  S^d., — American  10    cents, 


one  tenth  ditto,  6cl., — French  crown  pieces,  5s.  Gd., — 
French  half-crown  ditto,  2s.  9d., — Pistareens,  (formerly  Is. 
now)  lOd., — Half  Pistarcen,  5d., — together  with  some  few 
others,  occasionally,  though  very  rarely  seen,  such  as  five 
franc  pieces,  4s.  8d., — old  Spanish  quarter  dollars  without 
pillars,  Is, — English  bank  tokens  of  1812,  Ss.,  Is.  Gd., — 
and  Irish  lOd.  and  5d.,  now,  I  believe,  geneially  refused. 

Three  questions  appear  to  me  to  include  all  that  is 
meant  by  "  the  state  of  the  coins  in  circulation.'*^ 

First,  Which  of  the  coins  in  circulation  are  debased  ? 

Second,  What  is  the  extent  of  their  depreciation  ? 

Third,  Wliat  proportion  does  the  depreciated  bear  to 
the  sound  part  of  our  currency  ? 

The  two  first  questions,  it  will  be  seen,  form  but  one 
subject  for  inquiry. 

In  estimating  the  value  of  the  several  coins  in  circula- 
tion, the  dollar  of  60  pence  is  assumed  as  the  standard  into 
which  all  the  rest  are  resolved.  Here  the  Conmiiitee  of 
the  Legislative  Council  has  the  merit  of  having  adopted  the 
right  course, — actual  experiment. 

"  The  weights  of  the  coins  were  ascertained  by  actually 
weighing  the  quantities  thereof  so  specified,  respectively 
taken  at  hazard. 

The  following  are  the  results  of  the  experiment  above 
alluded  to : — 

1000  Spaiiisli  dollars  were  >  oz.  <f«'<.  gfs.  grs.  value. 

found  to  weigh  .  ...  5^  8G5      1      8  avei'age  415,  ea.  5s. 

200O  U.  States  half  dollars,  865   18     2       "  207  16-20,  ea.  2s.  6d. 

4000  Spanish  quarter     do.     829  19     6        <'  99  1-2,  ea.  Is.  2  1-Sd. 

5000  Pistareens 804     12"  779-50,  ea.  Os.   11  8-50d. 

3000  French  crowns 92S     0     4        <<  445  4-10,  ea.  5s.  4  l-2d. 

2000  French  half  do 863     4     6        *«  207  1-6  ea.  2s.  5  1.4d. 

Strictly  the  values  of  the  several  coins  will  be  as  follows  : 
that  is,  taking  the  data  of  the  Committee,  and  supposing  the 
standard  of  the  silver  contained  in  the  coins  to  be  the  same 
as  the  Spanish  standard.  It  will  be  seen  that  some  trilling 
errors  have  crept  into  their  calculation: — 

D 

United  States  half  dollar S0.04 

Spanish  quarter  dollar 1-1. 3S 

Spanish  pistareen 11.1.57 

Fiench  crown    64.53 

French  half  crown  29.92 

French  old  standard,  however,  is  rather  better  than 
Spanish  ;  containing  1  Uwt.  less  of  allov. 


8 

Tlje  French  crown,  when  unworn,  weighed  450  grs.,  ami 
contained  403-1  grs.  of  pure  silver.  The  coin  in  ciicuhition 
in  Canada,  has  lost  4-G  grs.  of  its  weight,  allowing  for  which 
it  will  he  ibund  to  contain  398.9  grs.  of  pure  silver,  giving 
5.42-1  for  its  true  value.  In  like  manner,  the  half  crown 
Jiaving  lost  17-83  grs.  will  he  found  to  contain  only  185.5 
grs.  of  pure  silver,  making  its  value  30-008.     Hence  the 

French  crown  is  depreciated 2  1- 1  per  centum. 

Spanisli  quarter  dollar  "         4-1-7    '«         " 

Spanish  pihtureeii  "         7  1-S    «'  " 

French  half  crown        "         9  1-10"         '< 

The  state  of  the  copper  coins  current  in  Lower  Canada 
also  demands  notice.  At  the  time  the  Committees  sat, 
complaints  of  the  trash  passing  as  copper  coin,  were  very 
general.  It  was  also  said  they  were  in  excess.  If  any 
thing,  their  condition  is  now  worse — they  consist  chiefly  of 
old  and  broken  copper  coin  of  all  nations  :  tokens,  and, 
probably,  bits  of  copper,  which  never  were  meant  for  coin. 
But  they  are  in  decided  scarcity,  so  much  so,  that  the 
Quebec  Bank  paid  2^  per  cent,  very  recently,  for  some. 
Indeed,  it  is  difficult  now  to  get  a  shilling's  worth  of 
coppers.  Of  the  recent  importation  of  pence,  halfpence, 
and  farthings,  the  latter  will,  most  likely,  find  their  way  into 
Lower  Canada,  where  they  pass  for  a  halfpenny.  A  good 
copper  coinage  to  replace  the  above  will  be  considered  in 
Chapter  IV. 

The  proportion  which  the  depreciated  portion  bears  to 
the  sound  portion  of  our  currency  may  be  ascertained  with 
accuracy  from  documents  furnished  by  the  report  of  the 
Committee  of  the  Assembly. 

In  the  Appendix  A,  will  be  found  a  statement  drawn  from 
the  above  report,  showing  the  amount  of  each  description 
of  coin  in  the  Public  Chest,  on  the  1st  January,  1830,  and 
also  the  average  amount  of  each  in  possession  of  the  Banks 
of  Montreal  and  Quebec. 

As  the  receiver  of  the  Customs  is  strictly  enjoined  to 
refuse  all  but  Spanish  and  American  dollars  and  half  dollars 
for  the  Crown  duties,  and  as  these  form  a  very  considerable 
portion  of  the  monies  paid  by  the  Collector  into  the  hands 
of  the  Receiver  General,  it  must  be  obvious  that  the  state 
of  the  Public  Chest  cannot  be  admitted  as  evidence  of  the 
proportion  which  erxh  coin  bears  to  the  whole  volume  of 
the  currency.  The  two  Banks,  however,  receive  and  pay 
all  coins  in  circulation  indifferently,  Tiiaking,  doubtless,  what' 


efFoits  they  are  able  to  keep  Spanisli  and  American  money 
in  their  hands  as  long  as  possible,  because  they  are  perpe- 
tually being-  called  upon  by  their  best  customers,  the  West 
India  merchants,  for  supplies  thereof  lor  Crown  duties; 
these  very  demands  are  continually  preventing  their  pos- 
sessing any  great  excess  of  such  coins,  and  so  neutralizing — 
if  we  may  be  allowed  the  expression — all  their  ellbrts  ;  so 
that,  on  the  average,  the  coins  held  by  the  Banks  will  exhi- 
bit a  tolerably  just  view  of  the  proportion  which  each  coin 
bears  to  the  whole  currency.  Calling  the  whole  currency 
1000,  no  less  than  671  parts  are  of  the  sound  portion  thereof, 
the  rest  being  composed  of  coins  more  or  less  depreciated. 

If  we  include  the  contents  of  the  Public  Chest  the  pro- 
portion of  the  sound  portion  will  be  still  greater,  namely, 
680  parts  in  1000.  The  additional  proportion  of  dollars 
and  halves  has  been  already  accounted  for  by  the  circum- 
stance that  the  Government  receives  those  coins  only  for 
the  duties  which  hitherto  it  has  claimed  to  appropriate. 

Having  now'  traced  out  the  state  of  the  currency  of 
Lower  Canada;  having  shown  what  coins  pass  above  their 
value,  and  how  much ;  it  remains  to  inquire  what  cflbcts 
must  result  from  such  a  state  of  things. 

The  effects  of  eniploying  a  currency  consisting  of  various 
coins,  some  passing  above  and  some  at  or  below  their 
value,  would  be  precisely  analogous  to  the  evils  arising 
from  the  employment  of  two  metals,  both  as  standard  mo^ 
ney,  where  the  relative  value  of  the  said  metals  had  depart- 
ed from  the  fixed  proportion.  These  evils  are  so  forcibly 
and  accurately  described  by  a  popular  writer,  that  I  shall 
adopt  his  words. 

"  Some  nations  have  made  use  of  two  metals,  gold  and 
"  silver,  both  as  standard  money,  or  legal  tender  to  any 
"  amount. 

"  For  this  purpose  it  was  necessary  to  fix  a  certain  rela- 
"  five  value  between  them.  A  certain  weight  of  the  one 
"  was  taken  to  be  equal  in  value  to  a  certain  weight  of  the 
"  other. 

"  If  the  proportion  thus  fixed  for  the  coins  were  accu- 
"  rately  the  i)roportion  which  it  obtained  in  the  market, 
"  and  continued  so  invariably,  there  would  be  no  inconve- 
"  nience  in  the  two  standards." 

So  far  the  case  does  not  apply  to  coins  passing  above 
Iheir  value  estimated  in  the  basis  of  the  currency.  It  is 
only  where  the  relative  value  of  the  two  metals  is  destroy- 


10 

ed  that  the  supposed  case  apphes  to  the  currency  of  Cana- 
da.    To  resume, 

"  The  relative  value,  however,  of  the  two  metals  in  the 
*'  market  is  fluctuating.  Suppose  that  the  value  fixed  for 
"  the  coins  is  that  of  15  to  l,in  other  words,  that  1  piece  of 
*'  gold  is  equal  to  15  pieces  of  silver  of  the  same  weight.  A 
*'  change  takes  place  in  the  market,  and  this  value  becomes 
*'  16  to  1.  What  follows?  A  man  who  has  a  debt  to  pay 
*'  equal,  let  us  say,  to  100  of  the  gold  pieces,  or  1500  of  the 
"  silver,  finds  it  his  interest  to  pay  his  debt  not  with  gold. 
"  With  his  100  gold  pieces  he  can  go  into  the  market  and 
*'  purchase  as  much  silver  as  may  be  coined  into  1600 
"  pieces  ;  with  1500  of  which  he  may  pay  his  debt,  and  re- 
*'  tain  100  to  himself.  In  this  manner  silver  would  be  mul- 
*'  tiplied  ;  and  the  quantity  of  the  currency  would  be  in- 
*'  creased  ;  its  value  would,  therefore,  be  diminished  ;  the 
"  gold  in  coin  would  thus  become  of  less  value  than  in  bul- 
"  lion  ;  hence,  the  gold  coins  would  be  melted,  and  would 
"  disappear."* 

What  follows  only  supposes  the  case  of  fluctuation  the 
other  way.  It  is  quite  unnecessary  to  quote  farther,  the 
reader  will  readily  apply  the  reasoning  contained  in  the 
above  passage  to  the  case  of  the  depreciated  coins  now 
current  in  Canada. 

If  a  sufficient  number  of  crowns,  half-crowns,  quarter  of 
dollars,  pistareens,  &c.  could  have  been  procured  from 
places  where  they  passed  at  or  under  their  value,  they 
would  long  since  have  displaced  all  our  more  valuable 
coins.  In  this  case,  the  rate  of  exchange  would  have  risen 
against  us  to  the  amount  of  the  depreciation  :  thus,  if  8  per 
centf  be  now  the  rate  which  is  necessary  to  make  up  the 
difference  between  the  nominal  par  and  the  real  par  value 
of  our  currency,  and  if,  say,  French  half  crowns  wholly^ 
filled  up  the  channels  of  our  circulation,  then  9  per  cent 
■would  be  to  be  added  to  the  rate  of  exchange,  whatever 
it  might  be — say  8  per  cent — and  17  per  cent  premium  (or 
8  +  9  per  cent  fluctuation  being  from  15  a  19,  as  now  from 
6  a  10)  would  be  the  ordinary  average  par  value  of  our 
currency. 

The  fact  that  we  have  still  so  large  a  portion  of  good 
and  faithful  coins  in  circulation  is  proof  either  that  America 


*  Mill's  Elements  of  Political  Economy,  third  edition^  page  14] -S. 
f  Vide  supra,  chap  ii,  sect.  1 .  par.  8. 


11 

does  not  contain  a  sufliciency  of  those  coins  to  fill  our 
channels  of  circulation,  or  that  they  are  current  elsewhere 
at  higher,  or,  at  all  events,  the  same  rates.  The  former  is 
the  case  with  all  the  depreciated  coins  ;  on  some  of  them 
the  latter  also  operates  as  a  cause  of  exclusion. 

In  the  United  States  of  America  the  French  crowns  and 
half-crowns  pass  for  a  dollar  and  half  a  dollar  only ;  the 
consequence  is  that  those  coins  are  rarely  seen.  The  same 
is  the  case  in  Upper  Canada,*  and,  we  believe,  in  New- 
foundland. At  what  rate  they  pass  in  other  parts  of  British 
America  we  have  no  information;  hence,  we  are  driven  to 
the  conclusion,  that  we  have  in  circulation  and  hoarded 
nearly  all  the  French  crowns  and  half  crowns  in  America.} 

With  regard  to  the  pistareens,  they  now  come  under  the 
second  supposition, — they  pass  elsewhere  higher  than  in 
Canada  ;  before  their  reduction  they  came  under  the  first. 
The  coin,  it  has  been  seen,  is  intrinsically  worth  llroVod. 
or  say  ll^d.  ;  while  it  was  current  here  at  12d.,  it  was  li- 
mited in  Nova  Scotia  to  lid.,  hence,  all  that  could  be  pro- 
cured passed  into  this  province.  So  many  were  current  in 
the  cities  of  Quebec  and  Montreal,  that  they  were  felt  to  be 
an    inconvenience.     An  outcry  was,  accordingly,  raised 


•  Demand  for  Lower  Canada  has  raised  French  crowns  in  Upper  Canada  to 
a  prenuuni. 

f  A  gentleman,  to  whom  the  MS.  of  this  article  was  shown,  and  whose  opinions 
are  entitled  to  attentive  consideration,  has  suggested,  that  '•  a  more  particular 
**  assignment  of  the  reasons  which  prevent  the  inferior  coins  from  driving  out  of 
"  the  market  those  whose  intrinsic  value  equals  or  surpasses  their  nominal  va- 
"  lue"  would  be  desirable.  1  have,  accordingly,  looked  over  what  I  had  written, 
tiut  can  find  nothing  to  add  to  what  is  stated  above,  in  the  shape  of  an  addition, 
al  reason  to  account  for  the  fact,  that  the  base  coins  have  not  usurped  the 
place  of  the  sound  coins.  The  general  law  that  inferior  coins  will,  if  allowed  to 
pass  concurrently  with  the  superior,  entirely  usurp  their  places,  appears  to  me 
true.  Then  comes  the  objection,  that  in  the  case  of  the  inferior  coins  of  Cana- 
da that  effect  has  not  taken  place, — followed  by  the  question — and  wliy  ?  The 
only  solution  that  can  be  offered  appears  to  me  to  be  that  given  in  the  teit ; 
namely,  1st,  That  there  are  not  enough  to  be  found  in  America  to  fill  the  chan- 
nel of  the  circulation  ;  2d,  That  some  of  them  pass  elsewiiere  at  equal  rates. 
The  trade  of  the  country  requires  a  certain  volume  of  circulating  medium  ;  that 
volume  canrot  be  supplied  by  the  debased  coins, — they  being  able  to  afford 
about  one-third  only, — the  rest,  therefore,  is  made  up  of  the  only  coins  to  be 
had,  namely,  dollars  and  half-dollars.  Another  consideration  is,  that  there  was 
an  actual  demand  for  a  certain  number  of  pistareens,  as  a  subsidiary  coin  ;  that 
number,  whatever  it  was,  would  be  able  to  pass  at  a  rate  considerably  above  its 
value,  without  the  slightest  inconvenience.  The  Hritish  silver  h  debused  10  per 
cent  witliout  being  depreciated.  To  my  mind  these  make  up  a  satisfactory  ex- 
planation of  the  fact,  I  tcuiil  they  will  do  to  to  that  of  the  reader  and  of  the 
iutclligeut  objector. 


12 

against  them, — they  were  stigmatised  as  "  the  rotten  part 
"  of  our  currency,"  and  the  10th  and  11  th  of  Geo.  IV.  cap.  5, 
effectually  drove  them  out  of  the  market,  by  declaring  them 
to  be  current  at  lOd.  only.  In  New  Brunswick  they  bear 
the  same  value,  and  even  there  they  are  a  legal  tender  to 
the  extent  of  5s.  only.  In  the  United  States  they  pass  for 
17  cents,  equal  to  lOj^od.,  Halifax  Currency,  whilst  in  Nova 
Scotia  they  are  valued  at  lid.,  hence,  by  that  Colony  they 
are  nearly  all  absorbed, — absorbed,  not  because  they  over 
value  them,  as  we  formerly  did,  but  because  ail  surround- 
ing States  undervalue  them. 

Like  all  bodies  of  men,  ignorant  of  the  matter  before 
them,  and  acting  without  any  fixed  principle,  our  law- 
makers have  deprived  the  country  of  what  might  have  been 
a  most  useful  coin  for  no  earthly  reason,  but  that  there  was 
a  prejudice  against  it.  In  attempting  to  rectify  an  acknow- 
ledged error,  the  Council  and  Assembly  overstepped  the 
line  of  truth,  and  created  an  error  exactly  equal  to  that 
which  existed  before.  It  is,  doubtless,  a  bad  thing  to  have 
a  coin  passing  as  the  pistareen  did,  unless  as  a  subsidiary 
coin,  limited  in  quantity;  but  as  depreciation  was  not  a 
property  of  the  coin  itself,  it  could  not  amount  to  a  reason 
lor  abolishing  it. 

In  the  mode  of  effecting  this  there  is  much  to  condemn. 
In  the  earlier  times  of  European  history,  before  civiliza- 
tion, and  its  concomitants,  education  and  a  press  tolerably 
free,  had  put  a  stop  to  glaring  acts  of  rapine  and  public 
robbery,  the  nominal  value  of  a  currency  was  frequently 
raised,  and  sometimes,  though  seldom,  lowered  to  suit  the 
sinister  purposes  of  despotic  governments.  Latterly,  how- 
ever, such  acts  of  aggression  have  been  extremely  rare  in 
Europe, — in  Great  Britain  wholly  unknown.  There  are, 
it  is  true,  still  to  be  met  w  ith,  men  sufficiently  barefaced  lo  - 
speak  in  favour  of  a  depreciated  currency ;  but,  fortunately, 
the  honest  part  of  the  community  is  too  many  for  them. 
Since  1819  every  act  of  the  Legislature  relating  to  the  cur- 
rency has  tended  to  promote  its  integrity  ;  and  it  is  only  by 
a  very  complicated  plan  of  operations  that  such  frauds  can 
be  effected. 

In  England,  when  the  coinage,  or  any  portion  thereof, 
becomes  depreciated  by  wear  to  an  extent  to  affect  the  ex- 
changes and  the  price  of  bullion ;  and  it  is  decided  to  call  it 
in  and  issue  another,  it  is  invariably  done  at  the  expense  of 
the  community.     The  measure  is  a  public  benefit, — the  re- 


13 

nioval  of  a  public  nuisance  ;  by  Ibc  public  at  large,*  llicrc- 
fore,  and  not  by  any  small  portion  tliercof  should  the  loss 
be  borne.  The  monstrous  fraud  of  iullicting  the  loss  on 
holders  could  never  have  been  carried  into  clfect  in  a 
country  where  the  bulk  of  the  population  was  in  a  situa- 
tion to  profit  by  an  independent  press,  and  where  that 
press  did  its  duty.  Where  the  great  mass  of  the  people, 
however,  is  destitute  of  the  elements  of  knowledge,  there 
is  but  little  demand  for  an  ellicient  press, — a  people's  only 
safeguard  ;  they  are  constantly  open  to  the  most  bare- 
faced  robbery  of  the  most  bungling  plunderers.  In  Eng- 
land, I  do  not  hesitate  to  say,  the  press,  in  a  body,  would 
have  condemned  the  measure,  denouncing  its  promoters 
and  supporters  as  open  promoters  of  fraud. 

Most  of  my  readers  will  recollect  the  effects,  even  of  tho 
agitation  of  the  measure,  on  trade.  As  it  became  certain 
that  it  would  be  carried,  in  a  way  to  exclude  tlie  possi- 
bility of  compensation  for  loss,  every  disposition  was 
evinced  and  every  eifort  made  to  get  rid  of  the  obnoxious 
coins.  Debtors  paid  their  creditors  with  pistareens  at  Is., 
knowing  they  would  be  worth  only  lOd.  at  the  rising  of  the 
morrow's  sun.  In  this  they  were  undoubtedly  justified, 
they  had  taken  the  coin  at  Is.,  the  lawful  rate,  and  while  it 
continued  a  legal  tender,  were  committing  no  moral  wrong 
in  discharging  their  debts  therewith.  One  anecdote,  in 
illustration,  deserves  jircserving.  A  grocer  of  Quebec, 
illustrious  for  the  extent  and  success  ef  liis  dealings,  owed 
a  merchant  a  sum  of  money ;  all  the  pistareens  in  his  pos- 
session he  sent  the  said  merchant  in  part  payment  of  his 
debt.  The  merchant,  however, — who  was  from  the  same 
side  of  the  Tweed  as  his  debtor, — hit  upon  an  expedient  to 
return  his  countryman  the  compliment.  Sagaciously  gues- 
sing his  former  debtor — having  the  fear  of  his  old  acquain- 
tances, the  doomed  coins,  before  his  eyes — would  refuse 
him  credit  pending  the  discussion  of  the  measure,  ho  sent 
his  storekeeper  or  cooper,  who  purchased  candles,  soap,  or 
some  such  article  to  about  the  amount,  paying  for  the  same 
in  the  dreaded  pistareens.  While  the  bill  was  waiting  the 
Governor's  assent,  some  few  shopkeepers  shut  up  their 
shops  to  avoid  the  evil  above  described.! 


*   This  is  the  opinion  of  W.  Finlay,  E^q sec  his  evidence.  Council  RcporL 

t  On  the  question  on   whom  should  the  loss  rail  ?    I   nm   also  at   issue   with 
the  objector  ulicadv  quoted  at  pugc  11  (note),  he  writes, — "in  Iht  catc  of  a 


14 

In  directing  the  measure  of  their  wrath  against  the  pista- 
reens,  the  Legislature  left  unnoticed  the  gieatest  offenders, 
namely,  the  French  hai-f  crowns.  In  amount  they  ex- 
liibit  an  excess  over  pistareens  of  21  per  cent.,  and  in  point 
of  depreciation  they  are  2  per  cent,  worse.  It  is,  there- 
fore, strange  that  in  their  zeal  to  amend,  neither  house 
of  the  Provincial  Legislature  (except  in  the  vague  and 
rcsultless  recommendation  of  the  Committee  of  the  Coun- 
cil,) thought  of  including  French  half  crov^'ns  in  their  bill, 
which  it  was  intended  should  work  wonders  in  the  way 
of  improvement. 

Before  I  dismiss  this  portion  of  the  subject,  I  take  leave 


<'  metropolitan  state  calling  in  her  worn  coin  for  the  purpose  of  making  a  new 
*'  issue,  it  is  her  oion  coin  siie  calls  in,  upon  which  she  has  had  the  seignorage, 
'*  &c.  In  this  case  it  is  foreign  coin,  and  no  wisdom  can  prevent  the  colony 
"  from  becoming  the  mart  for  all  this  debased  foreign  coin,  and  being  paid  for 
•'  at  a  price  above  its  real  value  by  the  colony." 

It  is,  indeed,  most  unwise  in  a  state  to  pay  for  a  coin,  or  other  commodity, 
more  than  it  it  is  worth  ;  but  in  tlie  case  under  consideration,  tlie  folly  lias  been 
Committed — the  colony  has  been  the  mart  ;  the  debased  coins  iiave  been  bought 
and  piid  for  ;  and  by  calling  them  in,  no  new  inducement  is  offered  to  bring 
them  fioni  a  distant  state  te  be  changed,  more  than  now  exists  in  their  free 
exchangeability  for  dollars. 

The  question  whether  or  not  the  local  governments  shall  defray  the  expense 
of  calling  in  and  re-issuing  the  coin,  resolves  itself  to  this.  Shall  the  loss  be 
borne  b^y  the  public  in  equal  or  unequal  shares?  If  holders  be  saddled  with 
the  loss,  some  are  great  sufferers  while  others  wholly  escape.  If,  on  the 
other  hand,  tlie  government  call  them  in,  every  tax-paying  individual  will 
contribute  his  fair  share  of  the  loss.  To  those  who  hold  that  the  pistareen  would 
purchase  as  great  a  quantity  of  commodities  after,  as  before  the  passing  of  the 
law,  (and  holders  pro  tanto  be  compensated,)  I  refer  to  page  15  of  the  text.  I 
would  further  remark,  that  on  the  basis  (and  the  bulk)  of  her  currency.  Great 
Britain  levies  no  seignorage,  consequently,  the  cost  of  calling  in  a  worn  coin  is 
an  unrequited  loss, — borne,  however,  fairly  and  equally,  (in  so  far  as  taxes  are 
fairly  and  equally  levied,)  by  every  tax-payer.  To  me  it  appears,  that  the  cir- 
cumstance of  a  colony  making  use  of  a  foreign  coin,  instead  of  being  an  argument 
against  her  bearing  the  loss,  is,  in  fact,  the  strongest  argument  in  favor  of  such 
a  course.  The  colony  is  saved  the  cost  of  a  mint  establishment — she  is,  there- 
fore, better  able  to  bear  the  loss  on  worn  coin  ;  in  fact,  wear  of  coin  is  as  una- 
voidable an  expense  to  a  people  as  the  administration  of  justice. 

Another  observation  too,  from  the  same  source,  appears  equally  open  to  dis- 
pute, namely,  that  it  is  a  question  between  debtor  and  creditor.  To  make  it  so, 
it  appears  to  me  the  debtor  should  lose  what  the  creditor  gains,  and  the  con- 
verse.  It  is  not  so,  however,  with  the  case  under  discussion.  A.  borrows  of  B. 
dS,  say  100  shillings,  which  is  received  in  pistareens.  To  make  the  case 
strong  let  us  sappose,  before  A,  can  make  use  of  the  said  pistareens  comes  the 
law,  changing  their  current  rate.  A.  tenders  the  pistareens  back  to  B.  who 
refuses  to  take  fewer  than  120  in  discharge  of  his  debt,  this  is  a  clear  loss  to  A. 
but  it  is  no  gain  to  B.  unless,  indeed,  what  the  autlior  of  a  Review,  &c.  says,  is 
true,  which  it  is  not,  hence  it  api»cars  that  A,  loses  not  as  a  debtor  but  as  a 
holder. 


15 

to  say  a  few  words  on  that  part  of  a  work  entitled,  a 
"  Review  of  tlie  proceedings  of  the  Legislature  of  Lower 
"  Canada  in  the  session  of  1831,"  which  relates  to  the  cur- 
rency. 

The  author  states  two  principles  whereby  to  try  the 
effects  of  allowing  pistareens  to  pass  current  at  a  nominal 
value  above  their  real  value. 

"  We  admit  that  money  can  under  no  circumstances  (!-?) 
"  be  made  to  circulate  beyond  its  intrinsic  value.  When 
"  the  nominal  value  is  increased  beyond  the  intrinsic  value, 
"  a  corresponding  increase  takes  place  in  the  prices  of  all 
"  commodities,  and  among  these  of  bills  of  exchange.  * 
"******  If  there  be  two  or  more  coins  form- 
*'  ing  a  part  of  the  legal  currency  of  a  country,  and  the  no- 
"  minal  value  of  the  one  be  higher  than  the  nominal  value 
"  of  the  other,  the  latter  will  be  displaced  by  the  former 
"  and  entirely  disappear,  or  be  obtainable  only  by  the  pay- 
"  ment  of  a  premium." — Review,  &c.  p.  125. 

The  first  principle  is  not  true,  until  the  effects  recited  in 
the  second  have  taken  place.  Why  they  did  not  take  place 
has  been  already  shown,  page  11.  Had  they  taken  place — 
had  pistareens  displaced,  or  permanently  raised  to  a  pre- 
mium the  sound  portion  of  our  currency,  there  is  no  doubt 
that  the  prices  of  all  commodities — including  exchange,  as 
shewn  page  10,  would  have  risen  in  the  precise  ratio  of  the 
depreciation.  The  case  of  the  pistareens,  in  fact,  does  not 
come  under  the  author's  general  rule.  They  never  dis- 
placed dollars  and  half  dollars,  or  raised  them  to  a  pre- 
mium;* hence  they  never  affected  prices;  all  that  is  predi- 
cated of  the  currency  in  the  work  in  question  is,  conse- 
quently, false,  and  in  many  cases  absurd,  manifestly  so 
indeed,  as  may  be  seen  by  the  following  extract. 

"  If  eggs  had  been  selling  at  12d.  previous  to  the  passing 
"  of  the  law,  they  would,  ceteris  paribus,  have  sold  for  lOd. 
"  after  its  passing ;  but  they  would,  in  both  instances,  have 
"  been  paid  (for)  by  the  same  identical  quantity  of  silver, 
"  or  other  precious  metal,  and  it  might  have  been  of  the 
"  same  identical  form." — Review,  eodem  loco. 

Now,  making  due  allowance  for  the  "  ceteris  paribus''^  of 
the  case,  which  we  presume  means  any  Jluctuation  of  price 


*  For  tbe  causes  which  have  occasionally  concurred  to  raise  dollars  to  a  pre- 
mium, see  chap.  2.  sec  2,  par.  C. 


16 

from  a  change  in  the  ratio  of  supply  and  demand,  we  put 
it  to  the  experience  of  every  man,  wiiether  as  many  eggs 
could  be  bought  for  a  pistareen  the  day  after  as  the  day  be- 
fore the  passing  of  the  law. 

The  sage  Augustus,  in  Mr.  Bulwer's  "  Paul  Clifford," 
says, — "  the  advantage  of  having  a  principle  is,  that  if  you 
fail  into  error,  it  is  your  principle  that  is  to  blame  and  not 
yourself." — Such  is  the  case  with  the  author  of  the  "  Re- 
view." The  same  number  of  eggs  would  certainly  have  sold 
for  a  pistareen  after,  as  before  the  passing  of  the  law,  pro- 
vided the  effects  predicated  in  the  second  principle  had 
taken  place;  that  is, — if  pistareens  had  filled  the  channels 
of  circulation.  But  this  they  never  did.  The  rule  has 
been  made  too  general,  a  common  error  with  hasty  writers. 

In  the  observations  (page  130,)  on  the  absurdity  of  at- 
tacking the  pistareens  and  leaving  the  French  half-crowns 
untouched,  I  fully  concur;  but  as  I  have  gone  through  this 
part  of  the  question,  (page  14,)  I  abstain  from  further  com- 
ment. Let  us  now  look  back  and  ascertain  the  steps  we 
have  advanced  in  this  inquiry.  We  have  established  which 
of  the  several  coins  current  in  Canada  are  depreciated ; 
their  per  centage  depreciation  has  been  pointed  out ;  and 
a  measure  of  the  proportion  which  the  said  depreciated 
coins  bear  to  the  whole  in  circulation  has  been  exhibited. 
From  these  three  settled  points — as  I  think  we  are  authorised 
in  calling  them — we  may  conclude :  that  the  quantum  of  dis- 
turbance  under  which  our  currency  has  been  supposed  to 
labour,  has  been  considerably  over-rated.  A  currency  can- 
not be  said  to  be  in  a  very  bad  state,  when  the  sound  portion 
consists  of  670  to  680  parts  out  of  1000,  especially  when  it 
is  considered  that  out  of  the  remaining  320  to  330  parts  a 
considerable  portion  consists  of  small  coins,  useful,  nay,  in- 
dispensible  for  the  common  purposes  of  interchange,  and, 
as  such,  may  without  any  inconvenience  be  permitted  to 
pass  at  rates  considerably  above  their  metallic  value. 

That  derangement  exists,  no  one  can  doubt — it  rests  on 
demonstration;  and  although  not  to  an  extent  to  warrant 
the  lamentations  occasionally  bestowed  upon  it,  still  quite 
sufficient  to  demand  a  remedy.  Of  that  remedy,  however, 
we  must  postpone  the  consideration,  until  we  have  pur- 
sued our  inquiries  to  a  branch  of  the  subject  absolutely 
necessary  to  the  perfect  understanding  of  the  whole, — we 
mean  the  exchange. 


17 


CHAPTER    II. 

THE    EXCHANGE. 

Section  I. — The  Nominal  Exchange. 

Having,  in  the  foregoing  chapter,  gone  through  the  exa- 
mination of  the  state  of  the  coins  in  circulation,  I  now  pro- 
ceed to  another  but  no  less  important  question,  which 
occupied  much  of  the  attention  of  the  Committees,  namely, 

THE    EXCHANGE. 

There  are  two  circumstances  on  which  the  rate  of  ex- 
change between  different  countries  depends.  First^  the 
relative  value  of  their  respective  currencies,  weight  and 
fineness  both  considered  ;  and,  second^  the  supply  of,  com- 
pared with  the  demand  for,  bills  of  exchange.  By  some 
writers,  the  first  has  been  called  the  nominal  exchange — 
the  second,  the  real  exchange — and  both  together  the  com- 
puted exchange.  In  this  section,  I  shall  treat  of  the  nomi- 
nal exchange  only.  The  nominal  exchange  may  be  affected 
by  the  use  of  paper  money ;  the  consideration  of  its  mode 
of  operating,  I  shall  put  off  till  the  next  section  ;  confining 
our  investigations  in  this,  to  the  nominal  exchange  between 
two  countries  using  metallic  currencies. 

Firsts  The  value  of  a  currency  is  determined  by  the 
quantity  of  pure  metal  contained  in  the  coins  forming  its 
basis,  alloy  being  left  wholly  out  of  the  account ;  and  the 
number  of  times  one  coin  is  contained  in  another,  is  called 
the  PAR  OF  EXCHANGE.  Thus,  if  one  dollar  contain  as  much 
pure  silver  as  five  franks,  then  the  par  between  the  United 
States  and  France  will  be  5f.=l$.  or  what  amounts  to  the 
same  thing,  20  c.=l  f. 

This,  however,  only  holds  good  between  two  countries 
making  use  of  the  same  metal  as  the  standard  of  their  res- 
pective currencies.  But,  of  some  countries,  gold  is  the 
standard,  of  others,  silver ;  between  such  countries  the  par 
is  not  invariable. 

Let  us  take  for  illustration,  the  par  between  England  and 
France,  or  America ;  gold  being  the  standard  in  the  former 
country — silver  in  the  two  latter. 

Having  ascertained  the  quantity  of  pure  silver  contained 
in  the  com  forming  the  basis  of  the  currency  of  the  country 

c 


18 

of  which  silver  is  the  standard,  we  must  find  what  it  is 
worth  at  the  market  price  of  silver  in  the  gold-using  coun- 
try, and  not  at  any  mint  price,  fixed  by  law  for  the  purpose 
of  calculation.  A  short  explanation  will  serve  to  render 
this  obvious. 

The  mint  price  of  silver  is  a  conventional  price,  insti- 
tuted for  the  purpose  of  fixing,  or  rather  attempting  to  fix, 
the  proportion  between  silver  and  gold.  The  silver  coin 
of  Great  Britain,  being  a  subsidiary  coin,  passes  at  a  rale 
considerably  above  its  real  value,  without  the  slightest 
inconvenience,  inasmuch  as  silver  is  not  a  legal  tender 
above  a  certain  amount,  namely,  forty  shillings.*  Fo- 
reign coins,  how^ever,  do  not  enjoy  this  advantage;  they 
are  merely  a  commodity,  worth  whatever  they  will  realize 
in  the  market,  at  the  market  price. 

The  market  price  of  silver,  like  that  of  all  other  com- 
modities, is  perpetually  fluctuating,  according  to  the  exist- 
ing ratio  of  supply  and  demand.  A  sudden  change  of 
wind,  for  example,  may  thrust  upon  the  market  a  large 
supply  of  silver  from  Mexico ;  a  decline  is  as  surely  the 
consequence,  as  a  decline  in  the  price  of  sugar  would  be 
upon  a  sudden  glut  of  that  article.  It  will,  at  once,  be 
seen,  that  between  two  countries  using  different  metals  as 
the  basis  of  their  currencies,  there  can  exist  no  invariable 
PAR  of  exchange.  Besidcs  the  cause  of  variation  above 
mentioned,  the  par  will  be  affected  by  any  change  in  the 
weight  or  purity  of  the  coins  in  either  of  the  interchanging 
countries. 

Many  of  the  pars  of  exchange  now  in  use,  were  fixed 
when  the  respective  coins  contained  a  different  quantity  of 
metal  than  at  present ;  hence,  most  of  them  are  erroneous, 
in  other  words,  they  are  far  no  longer;  and  such,  as  I 
shall  presently  show,  is  the  case  with  the  par  of  exchange 
made  use  of  in  this  country. 

When  the  language  of  exchange  is  so  much  of  the  cur- 
rency of  one  country  for  the  unit  of  the  other^  as  4s.  l|d. 
=  $1,  $4  80  ==£1,  12  guilders  =  £1,  25  francs  =  £1, 
and  so  forth,  no  inconvenience  can  arise  from  a  par  being 
assumed  ;  but  when,  as  in  Canada,  the  erroneously  assumed 


*  Practically,  however,  payments  are  made  in  silver  to  any  aniouilt,  as  the 
IBank  of  England  never  refuses  to  take  silver.  "  Change,"  as  it  is  called,  is,  in, 
fact,  scarce,  being  kept  so  by  moderate  issues.  Were  the  issues  of  silver  to  be- 
come excessive,  so  as  to  reduce  its  value,  those  who  had  money  to  receive  would 
lefuse  to  take  more  than  the  lawful  limit. 


19 

par  of  exchange  is  never  lost  sight  of,  but  enters  into  the 
language  of  commerce  daily  and  hourly,  it  does  lead  to  con- 
tradiction and  misunderstanding.  It  asserts  that  exchange 
is  at  a  premium,  when  it  may  be  cither  at  par  or  at  a  dis- 
count. The  practical  knowledge  of  merchants,  it  is  true, 
lead  them  to  call  5  or  6  per  cent,  premium  low^  tlius  tacitly 
abandoning  the  par  lixed  by  law  ;  for,  were  the  par  cor- 
rect, no  one  could  deny  that  5  per  cent,  would  bo  enor- 
mous as  a  premium,  indeed  utterly  incapable  of  being  main- 
tained. 

The  par  of  exchange  at  present  in  use,  namely,  4s.  Gd. 
sterling  =  5s.  currency,  was  fixed  when  the  Spanish  dol- 
lar, or  piece  of  eight,  as  it  was  then  called,  was  both  heavi- 
er and  finer  than  at  present.  The  old  dollar  weighed  17 
dwts.  12  grains,  and  the  standard  of  Spain  was  only  1  dwt. 
worse  than  that  of  Great  Britain,  the  dollar  being  tiien  ac- 
tually worth  4s.  6d.  at  the  mint  price  of  standard  silver.* 

Since  that  period,  however,  the  Spanish  standard  has 
been  lowered, — 7  dwts.  more  alloy  having  been  added  to 
the  lb.,  besides  which  the  weight  of  the  dollar  has  been  re- 
duced 4  grains,  namely  to  17  dwt.  8  grains,  the  pure  silver 
in  the  coin  being  370.9  grains. f  Now  for  whatever  sum 
three  hundred  and  seventy  grains  and  nine-tenths  will  sell 
in  the  London  market, — the  money  market  of  England, 
indeed  of  Europe, — that  sum  is  the  par  value  of  the  dollar. 

By  referring  to  appendix  B,  No.  1,  the  reader  will  find  a 
table  containing  the  price  of  silver  in  the  London  market, 
monthly,  from  1823  to  1828,  both  inclusive,  and  also  for 
1831;  unfortunately  I  do  not  possess  prices  for  1829  and 
1 830,  nor  do  I  know  any  source  in  this  country  whence  to 
derive  them.  Could  they,  however,  be  exhibited,  they 
would  not  much  affect  the  average  of  the  whole  period. 
No.  2  of  the  same  appendix  contains  the  annual  av(!rage 
prices  of  the  Spanish  dollar  calculated  from  No.  1,  together 
with  the  average  of  the  whole  period,  namely,  4s.  IICl  .3, 
which  would  require,  in  our  present  mode  of  computation,' 
a  premium  of  8^  per  cent,  over  and  above  our  assumed 
par,  to  bring  it  into  currency,  £100  sterhng  being  worth 


♦  See  Ordinance  17  Geo.  III.  c.  iii.  and  Mr.  Young's  evidence,  AssemhJy 
Report,  Svo.  cd.  p.  ol.  Tlie  mint  price  of  silver  then  coincided  more  nearly 
with  the  market  price  timn  at  prcs(;nt. 

f  These  facts  were  taken  from  h  table  in  the  second  edition  of  Kelly's  Cam- 
biit.     See  uiso  article  «'  Money"  in  the  Supplement  lo  the  l^neycl.  Uiilt. 


'20 


£120  4s.  2^d.  In  the  state  of  the  English  currency  last 
year,  silver  commanded  rather  a  higher  price,  seldom  sink- 
ing below  4s.  11  gd.  the  ounce,  and  sometimes  commanding 
5s.,  giving  for  the  value  of  the  dollar  4s.  2d.,  and  requiring, 
in  our  erroneous  language,  8  per  cent  premium  to  bring 
the  real  up  to  the  nominal  par,  £100  sterling  being  worth 
£120  currency,  or,  in  fact,  20  per  cent  premium.  This, 
therefore,  must  be  considered  the  approximate  par*  of  ex- 
change,— the  ordinary  average  value  of  our  currency  esti- 
mated in  British  sterling. 

From  the  facts  thus  exhibited,  it  will  be  seen,  that  our 
ordinary  premium  is  only  an  expedient  necessary  to  bring 
the  real  par  up  to  the  nominal  par.  The  analysis  of  the 
process  will  make  this  evident : — 

B.    d. 

Average  value  for  the  dollai-, 4     2  sterling,   £  100 

8  per  cent  premium  on  50d.  is 0    4  8 

Nominal  value  of  the  dollar, 4     6  sterling,       108 

Add  one-ninth,  according  to  the  ordinary  rule,  page  (     ,)  0     6  12 

Current  denomination  of  dollar, 5     0  120 

Hence,  when  exchange  is  nominally  at  6  or  7  per  centpre- 
mium — as  in  June  1831 — it  is,  intact,  at  a  discount;  that 


*  The  lowest  price  of  silver  occurred  in  March  1822  and  in  September  1826, 
both,  be  it  remembered,  periods  of  low  prices,  consequent  upon  commercial  dis- 
tress  and  a  contracted  currency.  The  price  was  4s.  J0|d.  This  price  will  be 
found  to  give  4s.  lid. .6  for  the  value  of  the  dollar,  corresponding  to  which 
will  be  found,  as  a  par,  the  nominal  premium  of  £10  9s.  2d.  per  £100,  a  par 
which  would  allow  exchange  to  get  up  to  nearly  13  per  cent  before  the  pre- 
cious metals  would  begin  to  be  exported. 

The  highest  price  occurred  from  September  to  the  close  of  182.5,  the  very  top 
of  the  speculative  period,  with  a  currency  redundant,  and  just  before  the  cele- 
brated panic.  The  price  was  5s.  Id.,  giving  for  the  value  of  the  dollar 
4s,  2|d..6,  or  nearly  ("within  4-10  of  an  i  of)  4s.  Sd.,  and  a  nominal  premium 
of  £,6  Is.  4d.  per  dElOO,  hence,  the  average  par  of  8  per  cent  would,  at  that 
time,  almost  have  fulfilled  the  condition  of  an  exportation  of  silver.  The  mean 
between  the  two  extremes  coincides  very  nearly  with  the  ordinary  average,  as 
may  be  seen  by  comparing  the  annexed  table  with  B,  No.  2,  of  Appendix. 


Highest.... 
Lowest. ... 

Price  of 
silver. 

Value  of 
dollar. 

Nominal 
premium. 

Value  of  JlOOiu 
Halifax  currency. 

s.    d. 
5     1 
4  lOj 

s.     d. 
4     21.6 
4     1    .6 

£     s.    d. 

6     14 

10     9     2 

£     g.   d. 
117  17     Of 
122  14     7i 

Mean 

4  UJ 

4    3    .1 

8     5     3 

120     5  10 

21 

is,  unless  the  par  has  been  disturbed  by  an  advance,  above 
the  ordinary  rate,  of  the  price  of  silver ;  and  wlien  tlie  pre- 
mium is  nominally  9|  per  cent,  as  now,  (August  1832,)  it 
is,  in  fact,  only  1|  per  cent  above  the  ordinary  par.  The 
price  of  silver  in  London,  according  to  the  last  (piotation, 
was  as  low  as  at  the  lowest  period,  namely,  4s.  lOfd. 
This  would  give  nearly  10|  per  cent  as  the  par,  and  the 
present  real  exchange  actually  at  nearly  1  per  cent  dis- 
count. 

From  these  considerations  it  appears  to  me  highly 
inexpedient  to  fix  a  par  of  exchange.  It  leads  to  faulty 
language,  and  to  much  inconvenience,  and,  as  far  as  I  can 
discern,  answers  no  good  purpose.  In  changing  its  lan- 
guage from  "  so  much  per  cent  premium'^  to  "  so  muck 
"  sterling  per  Spanish  dollar''^  the  Government  has  acted 
wisely ;  and  there  appears  no  good  reason  why  the  im- 
provement should  not  be  extended  to  the  language  of  ex- 
change in  general.  If,  however,  it  be  determined  to  make 
use  of  a  par  of  exchange,  from  which  all  fluctuations  shall 
be  made  to  start,  it  would  be  extremely  desirable  that 
such  par  should  be  exact.  But  it  has  already  been  seen, 
that  the  par  of  exchange  between  silver-using  America  and 
gold-using  England  must  be  liable  to  perpetual  variation  ; 
we  are,  consequently,  constrained,  as  the  best  course  open 
to  us,  to  fix  upon  the  par  of  exchange,  which  the  average 
price  of  silver,  taken  over  a  period  sufficiently  long  to  in- 
clude fluctuations  from  highest  to  lowest,  is  found  to  indi- 
cate. In  other  words,  if  there  exist  no  unvarying  par  of 
exchange  to  fix  upon  the  approximate  par  of  exchange, 
namely,  8  per  cent  premium,  or  adding  what  is  afterwards 
necessary  to  bring  the  whole  into  currency  20  per  cent,* 
the  rules  of  conversion  being, — to  sterling  add  one-fifth  to 
give  currency, — from  currency  deduct  one-sixth  to  give 
sterling. 

It  does  not  appear,  that  any,  the  slightest,  inconvenience 
could  arise,  were  this  change  brought  about  at  once, — were 
the  language  of  exchange, — for  it  is  a  case  of  naming  only, 
and  has  nothing  to  do  with  the  state  of  the  currency, — to 
be  altered.  It  would  not  interfere  with  existing  contracts, 
as  all  are  here  made  in  currency  of  four  dollars  to  the  £1, 
and  the  £1  of  four  dollars  would  still  be  the  currency  of  the 
country.     It  would  not  augment  taxation  by  affecting  the 


*  Sec  the  Aiia'ysii  in  the  last  page. 


22 

» 

crown  duties,  inasmuch  as  the  rule  of  conversion,  by  which 
the  sterhng  crown  duties  are  converted  into  currency,  is 
fixed  by  an  order  in  Council,  and  in  fact,  at  this  moment, 
departs  equally  from  the  customary  par,  and  from  truth, 
being  more  than  the  first  and  less  than  the  last  by  about 
4  per  cent.* 

Occasionally,  it  may  be  urged,  some  few  contracts  made 
in  England  in  sterling,  are  paid  here  in  currency,  such  for 
instance  as  freight.  In  the  majority  of  these  cases,  it  is 
stipulated,  payable  at  the  actual  premium  of  exchange  at  the 
time  being.  When,  however,  either  through  ignorance  or 
inadvertency,  such  stipulation  is  omitted,  the  creditor 
receives  less  than  his  due,  a  species  of  injustice  of  which 
law  should,  in  no  case,  be  made  the  sanction.  Sometimes 
the  payment  of  freight  in  currency  is  conventional — is 
nnderstood  and  allowed  for  by  all  parties  concerned.  In 
this  case,  if  competition  had  reduced  freight  to  a  certain 
rate  so  payable,  it  would  have  reduced  it  8  per  cent  more, 
if  payable  at  the  ordinary  premium.  I  need  not  expatiate 
any  further  on  the  par  value  of  our  currency.  If  I  have 
failed  to  make  myself  understood,  I  must  beg  the  reader 
to  go  over,  once  more,  the  propositions  I  have  endeavoured 
to  elucidate  and  which  I  now  recapitulate. 

First,  That  it  is  the  quantity  of  pure  silver  contained  in 
the  £1  currency,  at  the  English  market  price,  that  deter- 
mines the  par  for  the  time  being,  {ante  page  18.) 

Second,  That  as  the  market  price  of  silver  like  that  of 
all  other  commodities,  is  perpetually  fluctuating,  there  can 
be  no  fixed  par  of  exchange,  {ante  page  18.) 

Third,  That  if  it  be  deemed  adviseable  to  establish  a 
par  from  which  all  fluctuations  shall  start,  and  if  there  be 
no  par  to  be  found  at  all  times  correct ;  then  we  are  con- 
strained to  adopt  the  best  course  open  to  us,  and  fix  upon 
the  approximate  par,  {ante  page  21.) 

Fourth,  That  the  average  price  of  silver  taken  over  a 
period  sufficiently  long  to  include  fluctuations,  from  the 
highest  to  the  lowest  will  indicate  with  perfect  accuracy 
the  said  approximate  par,  {ante  page  21,)  and  lastly. 

Fifth,  That  4  l|s.  3  is  the  average  value  of  the  dollar  as 


*  The  people  of  this  country  and  the  popular  press  ever  jealous— and  wisely 
—of  any  attempt  of  the  mother  country  at  taxation,  are  not  aware  tlint  whcii 
the  mode  of  computing,  the  Spanish  dollars  was  changed  from  4s.  Od.  to  4s.  4d. 
at  the  Custom  HousCj  4  per  cent,  was  added  to  the  crown  duties. 


23 

exhibited  by  the  above  process,  giving  in  the  erroneous  lan- 
guage now  in  use  8}  per  cent  premium,  as  the  average 
value  of  our  currency,  or  including  the  addition  which  is 
necessary  to  bring  tiie  whole  into  currency  20  4  2|  per 
cent,  £100  sterling  being  actuftlly  worth  £120  4s.  2?,d. 
{ante  page  20,  and  appendix  B.  2,)  but  as,  for  the  last  few 
years,  owing  to  the  steadier  state  of  the  English  currency, 
4s. 2d.  is  the  average  value  of  the  dollar,it  would  be  expedient 
to  adopts  per  cent  as  the  approximate  par,  {ante  jjage^O.) 

Section  II. 

On  the  Effects  of  Paper  Money,  on  the  Nominal  Exchange. 

In  the  foregoing  section,  I  have  endeavoured  to  illustrate 
the  two  circumstances  liable  to  influence  the  nominal  ex- 
change, and  so  produce  fluctuation  in  the  par  value  of  our 
currency.  These  two  circumstances  we  have  seen  are, 
firsty  fluctuations  in  the  market  price  of  bullion,  second^ 
changes — generally  reductions  in  the  weight  and  fineness  of 
the  coins.  It  is  but  seldom  the  second  occurs,  one  instance 
only  (page  19,)  having  been  brought  within  our  notice; 
the  first,  on  the  other  hand  is  never  wholly  inoperative 
In  this  section  the  effects  on  the  nominal  exchange  of  the 
use  of  paper  money  in  either  of  the  interchanging  countries, 
will  be  considered. 

Paper  money  has  several  inconvenient  properties  inse- 
parable from  it.  For  our  present  purpose,  however,  it  is 
only  necessary  to  mention  one,  namely,  liability  to  excessive 
issue,  and  consequent  depreciation. 

Under  proper  regulations  and  restrictions,  this  bad  pro- 
perty, and  indeed  all  others,  of  paper  money  may  be  almost 
nullified  ;  it  is  only  where  a  vicious  system  of  banking 
exists  that  it  amounts  to  an  evil  of  any  moment.  A  paper 
currency  is  either  irredeemable, — by  some  writers  called 
compulsory — or  convertible. 

An  irredeemable  paper  currency  is  where  the  issuers  are 
exempt  from  paying  coin  for  the  same  at  the  will  of  the 
holder.  A  convertible  paper  currency  speaks  for  itself;  it 
is  the  reverse  of  the  other. 

The  issue  of  paper  money  is  profitable.  It  is  a  means 
of  borrowing  so  much  capital  as  it  represents ;  hence  the 
temptation  to  issue  largely  is  very  great. 


24. 

So  long,  however,  as  coin  can  be  demanded  at  the  will  of 
the  holder,  a  limit  exists  to  the  evil  of  excessive  issues  and 
consequent  depreciation.*  When,  on  the  other  hand,  the 
obligation  on  the  issuing  banks  to  pay  in  bullion  is  removed, 
there  is  no  limit  to  depreciation.  It  must  become  ex- 
cessive. 

The  limit  to  excessive  issues  where  the  currency  is  con- 
vertible, may  be  readily  explained. 

The  effect  of  depreciation  is  to  raise  prices  of  all  commo- 
dities and  among  the  rest  of  gold  and  silver.  Still,  how- 
ever, the  sovereign  will  only  lawfully  purchase  as  much  as 
£1  in  paper  money,  although  the  gold  which  it  contains  is 
worth,  let  us  suppose  £1  Is.  It,  hence,  becomes  profitable 
to  convert  sovereigns  into  bullion,  and  they  are  either  car- 
ried to  the  melting  pot  on  account  of  the  holders  or  are  sur- 
reptitiously sold  to  the  melters  at  the  supposed  premium  of 
5  per  cent,  less  the  cost  and  profits  of  melting.  This  highly 
profitable  trade  begets  a  disposition  to  carry  paper  to  the 
banks  for  coin,  coin  is  accordingly  demanded,  until  the 
volume  of  the  currency  is  again  reduced  ;  and  bullion  de- 
clines to  a  price  at  which  melting  is  no  longer  profitable. 

Besides  the  melting  of  the  coin,  when  it  is  more  valuable 
in  the  shape  of  bullion,  there  is  another  check  upon  depre- 
ciation in  its  profitable  exportation. 

An  advance  in  the  price  of  bullion,  has  the  effect  of  turn- 
ing the  foreign  exchanges  against  the  paper- using  country. 
One  hundred  sovereigns  in  England  will  purchase  only 
£100  worth  of  commodities,  though  the  gold  they  contain 
is  worth — as  in  the  case  already  supposed — say  £105  in 
the  depreciated  paper  currency.  Sent  abroad,  however,  and 
exchanged  for  foreign  metallic  currency,  the  sum  will  pur- 
chase a  bill  on  London  for  £105,  less  the  cost  oj  transmitting 
the  precious  metals,  f  In  this  case  the  same  motive  exists  to 
demand  coins  at  the  banks  and  the  same  effects  follow.    By 


*  Many  writers  are  in  the  habit  of  considering  the  circumstance  of  a  paper 
currency  being  convertible  at  the  will  of  the  holder,  a  perfect  guarantee  against 
depreciation.  So  it  would  be  if  perfect  cojivertibility  could  exist.  The  theory 
is  correct  only  as  far  as  allowances  are  made,  for  the  checks  necessarily  oppoied 
to  perfect  convertibility ;  when  applied  practically,  they  must  be  allowed  for 
like  resistance  and  other  countervailing  forces  in  mechanics.  It  may  be  well  in 
elementary  treatises  to  leave  out  their  consideration  at  first,  but  their  operation 
should  be  subsequently  fully  treated  of;  as  this  essay  is  practical  they  are  entered 
into  at  once. 

t  For  the  real  exchange  and  its  limits,  see  next  section. 


25 

the  operation  of  one  or  both  of  the  above  checks  a  favor- 
able turn  is  given  to  the  exchanges, — bullion  declines  in 
price, — the  currency  is  pro  tanto  raised  to,  or  nearly  to  par, 
and  both  melting  and  exportation  cease  to  be  profitable. 
The  natural  limits,  therefore,  to  the  depreciation  of  a  con- 
vertible paper  currency  are  the  cost  of  transmitting  coin  to 
adjacent  countries  or  of  melting  it ;  wliicliever  of  the  two 
happens  to  be  least. 

VVhen  Governments  permit  the  melting  of  coin,  and 
the  free  exportation  of  coin  and  bullion,  as  the  Government 
of  Great  Britain  now  wisely  does,  there  is  but  a  very  trifling 
expense  incurred  in  distributing  the  precious  mr.tals  between 
contiguous  and  circumjacent  countries,  in  the  exact  quanti- 
ties required  by  their  respective  trades  ;  very  trifling,  there- 
fore, will  be  the  depreciation  to  which  the  currency  of 
Great  Britain  or  any  such  free  country  is  liable.  When, 
however,  difficulties  are  thrown  in  the  way,  when  penalties 
are  instituted  against  the  exporters  of  coin  and  bullion,  and 
against  melters,  the  object  has  been  entirely  defeated. 
Neither  melting  nor  exportation  have  ever  been  stopped 
thereby ;  they  have  merely  been  thrown  out  of  respectable, 
into  disreputable  hands,  and  rendered  more  costly,  inas-. 
much  as  something  has  to  be  added  to  compensate  risk  of 
infringing  the  law,  in  addition  to  cost  of  freight  and  insu- 
rance. Even  if  the  penalty  for  infraction  be  imprisonment 
or  death,  and  not  fine  or  forfeiture,  it  is  still  estimatable  in 
money,  because,  there  is  no  penalty  men  will  not  render 
themselves  liable  to  for  money,  especially  taking  into  consi- 
deration the  chances  against  detection. 

This  increased  cost  of  distributing  the  precious  metals  gives 
an  increased  latitude  to  depreciation — to  the  profitable  issue 
of  notes ;  hence,  we  may  easily  understand,  why  paper 
issuing  banking  establishments  have  always  raised  an  out- 
cry against  the  permission  to  deal  with  money  as  with  a 
commodity  ;  and  called  for  sanguinary  and  cruel  penal  laws 
against  a  useful  class  of  men— the  dealers  in  bullion.  Any 
natural  or  other  circumstance  apart  from  systems  of  banking, 
which  increases  the  cost  of  distributing  the  precious  metals 
also  extends  the  limit  of  depreciation  : — war  by  raising 
freight  and  insurance ;  seasons  by  doing  the  same.  On 
these  it  is  not  necessary  to  expatiate  in  this  place  ;  we  shall 
treat  of  them  more  fully  when  we  come  to  inquire  into  the 
real  exchange.    The  limit  may  also  be  extended  and  do- 

D 


26 

preciation  promoted  by  any  regulation,  which  throws  diflTi- 
cuity,  or  trouble  in  the  way  of  taking  notes  to  be  changed. 
The  closing  of  banks  at  hours  and  on  days,  at  and  on  which 
only^  certain  classes  can  attend  to  get  their  notes  changed. 
This,  it  may  be  objected,  may  be  obviated  by  employing 
others  who  can  attend  ;  to  which  it  may  be  replied,  that  the 
employment  of  others  is  attended  with  risk,  small  it  may 
be,  but  at  all  events  sufficient  to  stand  in  the  way  of  the 
perfect  convertibility  of  paper  money. 

To  give  a  bank  an  exclusive  privilege  to  supply  too  large 
a  district,  also  throws  an  enormous  difficulty — distance — in 
the  way  of  conversion,  including  risk  of  conveyance  ;  it  may 
amount  quite  to  an  assignable  premium. 

The  last  item  I  shall  notice  under  the  head  of  impedi- 
ments in  the  way  of  convertibility,  is  a  small  note  currency. 
Spread  over  a  considerable  district  and  necessarily  in  many 
hands,  small  notes  have  a  great  tendency  to  fill  up  the  chan- 
nels of  circulation,  to  an  extent  to  produce  depreciation. 
No  one  individual  possesses  enough  to  make  it  worth 
his  while  to  carry  them  to  a  distance  to  be  changed 
for  coin,*  unless  the  depreciation  be  sensibly  great; 
and,  the  circulation  of  a  district  of  moderate  extent, 
does  not  offer  any  inducement  to  a  money  dealer  to  set  up 
in  the  neighbourhood.  The  whole  business  would  not  pay 
him.  With  a  sound  system  of  banking,  however,  small 
notes  in  the  opinion  of  many  eminent  men,  and  among  the 
rest  of  the  late  Mr.  Ricardo,  may  be  allowed  currency,  with- 
out producing  inconvenient  results.  When  combined  with 
monopoly  of  a  large  district,!  with  restrictions  in  the 
way  of  exportation  and  melting — and  with  vexatious 
delay  begetting  regulations  at  the  banks  and  changing 
houses,  paper  money  may  produce  and  has  produced  de- 


*  I  leave  out  of  the  account  the  case  of  suspected  stability,  I  assume  that 
perfect  faith  exists  in  the  safety  of  banks,  inducements  to  demand  coin  arising 
out  of  the  state  of  the  currency  are  alone  treated  of, 

\  Had  Mr.  Attwood  and  the  currency  mongers  succeeded  in  introducing  a 
small  note  currency,  it  is  most  likely,  that  combined  with  the  exclusive  privi- 
leges of  the  Bank  of  England,  the  British  currency  would  have  been  per- 
manently depreciated — prices  would  have  been  permanently  raised — and  the 
exchanges  permanently  against  her,  oiir  par  would  have  been  reduced  nominally, 
in  the  ratio  of  the  depreciation — if  they  had  succeeded  to  the  extent  of  calling 
*•  half  a  crowa  three  shilliogs,"  currency  and  sterling  would  then  coincide. 


27 

preciation,  although  nominally  convertible  at  the  will  of  tlie 
holder. 

An  instance  of  an  expedient  to  create  delay  resorted  to 
by  the  Bank  of  England,  merits  a  place  here.  When  silver 
was  a  legal  tender  to  any  amount,  the  Bank  of  England, 
during  the  prevalence  of  an  extraordinary  demand  for  bul- 
lion, actually  paid  in  sixpences  ;  hence  demanders  gave 
up  the  point  in  despair,  and  the  currency  continued  depre- 
ciated— the  foreign  exchanges  continued  against  England. 
This  case  is  not  without  a  parallel  here.  When  large 
demands  have  been  made  upon  the  Bank  coffers,  they  have 
made  their  payments  in  the  small  and  depreciated  coins. 
These  coins  not  being  available  for  the  purposes  for  which 
they  were  demanded,  have  been  returned  to  the  banks,  to 
the  manifest  promotion  of  paper  issues.  But  dollars  or  half 
dollars  were  absolutely  required,  hence  those  who  required 
them,  were  constrained  to  pay  a  premium  rather  than  go 
w^ithout.  Now  will  any  one  affirm  that  this  premium  was 
created  wholly  by  the  existence  of  the  depreciated  coins, 
unaided  by  any  excess  of  paper  ?  Were  not  the  depreciated 
coins,  rather  a  tool  in  the  hands  of  the  Banks,  wherewith  to 
force  their  notes  into  circulation,  and  sell  their  stock  of 
sound  coins  at  a  profit,  over  the  expense  of  bringing  them 
from  the  United  States,  where  they  are  in  the  habit  of  re- 
.•eetfting  them  in  payment  for  exchange  ?  and  would  it  not 
be  well  to  deprive  the  Banks  of  such  an  instrument  of  in- 
jury ?  I  cannot  anticipate  any  but  an  affimative  answer  to 
these  questions.  If  the  debased  coins  were  the  sole  cause, 
dollars  and  half  dollars  would  be  at  a  permanent  premium, 
it  is  only  when  other  causes  concur — and  what  so  obvious 
as  an  excess  of  paper — that  such  premium  exists.  I  have 
extended  my  remarks  on  the  possibility  of  a  convertible 
currency  being  depreciated,  to  a  sufficient  length,  let  us 
now  consider  the  more  obvious  case  of  an  irredeemable  or 
compulsory  paper  currency. 

It  is  well  known  to  the  reader,  that  the  run  upon  the 
Bank  of  England  produced  by  a  fear  of  invasion  in  I70G-7, 
reached  such  an  alarming  extent  in  the  early  part  of  1797, 
that  on  Saturday,  the  25th  of  February,  only  i:i,-272,OOU 
remained  in  her  coffers,  and  as  the  run  was  expected  to 
continue  through  the  following  week,  an  order  in  Council 
was  issued  on  the  intervening  Sunday,  prohibiting  the 
Bank  of  Englnnd  from  paying  its  notes  in  cash,  until  the 


28 

sense  of  the  Commons  could  be  taken  on  the  subject.  Par- 
liament soon  after  continued  the  restriction,  "  till  six 
months  after  the  signature  of  a  definitive  treaty  of  peace." 
The  return  to  cash  payments  did  not  take  place  till  1821. 
In  1817,  the  Bank  was  fully  able  to  resume  paying  cash  ; 
it  was  not  however,  till  1819,  that  59  Geo.  III.  c.  78,  called 
Mr.  Peel's  Bill,  v/as  passed.  This  Act  ordained,  that  cash 
payments  should  be  resumed  in  1823,  but  as  the  Bank  had 
been  some  time  preparing  for  the  event,  they  commenced 
specie  payments  on  the  1  st  May,  1 82 1.  Hence  the  period  of 
restriction  and  depreciation — halcyon  days  to  the  Bank, 
alas  never  to  return ! — may  be  said  to  have  endured  twenty- 
four  years. 

As  soon  as  the  Bank  Directors  began  to  feel  the  power 
with  which  the  Bank  Restriction  Act  invested  them,  they 
fully  availed  themselves  of  its  advantages.  Their  issues 
were  pushed  to  a  great  extent  indeed,  and  in  Oct.  1813, 
the  currency  had  reached  the  enormous  depreciation  of 
27 ro  percent.  In  the  appendix  (G)  will  be  found  a  table 
shewing  the  annual  average  depreciation  of  the  British  Cur- 
rency from  1800  to  1821,  and  it  is  to  this  table,  the  reader 
must  refer  for  an  explanation  of  the  state  of  the  American 
exchanges  during  the  period. 

During  the  American  War,   1812 — 1815,   exchange  mr^^ 
London  was  at  a  heavy  discount.     Some  attributed  it  to  an 
extensive  circulation  of  army  bills,  others  to  other  causes. 
It  is,  however,  evidently  in  the  state  of  the  English  cur- 
rency at  the  time  that  the  cause  is  to  be  found. 

At  the  extreme  height  of  the  bank  restriction,  when  the 
currency  was  27i-o  per  cent  depreciated,  £100  drawn  -ia-.*^^ 
London  would  only  be  paid  in  paper  money,  worth  £72,  2s. 
in  bullion.     Had  the  £100  bill  been  paid  for  in  Canada,  in 
notes  equally  depreciated,  no  disturbance  of  the  ordinary  - 
course  of  exchange  would  have  taken  place  ;  but  hard  dol- 
lars had  to  be  given,  no  more  hard   dollars,   therefore, 
w^ould  be  given  than  would  discharge  the  debt,  by  send- 
ing them  home,  expense  of  sending  home  included,  of 
which  in  next  section.     At  the  period  to  which  we  allude 
silver  was  worth  6s.  lid.  per  ounce,  giving  for  the  value  of 
the  dollar  5s.  9|d.     A  debt  of  5s.  Old.  sterling,  therefore, 
could  be  paid  with  5s.  currency,  hence  £100  sterling  could 
be  paid  with  £86,  12s.  lOd.  currency.     But  £86,  12s.  lOd. 
currency,  at  the  assumed  par,  (assumed  then  as  well  as 


29' 

now,)  is  £77,  19s.  7d.  sterling,  hence  a  nominal  discount 
of  22  per  cent  was  necessary  to  bring  down  our  metallic 
currency  to  the  par  of  British  paper.     Thus, 

£100     0     0  sterling. 
Discount, 22     0     5 

£77  19     7 
Addone-ninth,..,         8  1,^     3 

£86  12  10 

The  proportionate  value  between  gold  and  silver  in  the 
Lopdon  market  was  then  nearly  what  it  is  now,  namely, 
about  1  to  15.52  per  cent,  hence,  gold  being  considered  the 
standard  of  English  money,  the  bullion  value  of  the  dollar 
was  the  same  as  now. 

Gold, £5  8     0  per  ounce. 

Silver, 0  6  11       ditto. 

Hence, 

As  £5,  8s.     :     6s.  lid.     :     :  £S,  17s.  lO.Jd.     :     4s.  ll^d. 

On  that  supposition  let  us  try  the  value  of  £100  sterling  in 
our  currency,  less  the  amount  of  depreciation. 

£100     0     0  sterling. 
/^Tx-.-  Less  highest  depreciation, 27  18    0 

Metallic  value  of  £100, £72     2     0 

Add  one-fifth, 14     8     5  by  rule,  page  (    .) 

£86  10     5 

To  produce  this  result  would,  in  our  language  of  ex- 
change, require  a  discount  of  22^  per  cent,  thus  agreeing 
very  nearly  (within  n,  per  cent)  with  our  first  calculation 
at  the  market  price  of  the  dollar. 

Depreciation  of  the  currency  at  home  is,  in  its  effects, 
equivalent  to  our  enhancement  or  appreciation  of  the  cur- 
rency here  ;  and,  vice  versa,  depreciation  of  our  currency  is 
equivalent  to  appreciation  of  the  currency  of  Great  Britain. 
Tlie  first  determines  the  exchanges  against  England,  the  se- 
cond in  her  favour.  I  believe  I  have  now  gone  through  all 
that  need  be  said  on  the  effects,  on  the  nominal  exchange,  of 
a  paper  currency  liable  to  depreciation.  It  affects  the  ex- 
change mediately  through  the  piece  of  silver,  and  is,  in  fact, 
only  a  case  under  the  general  cause  mentioned  in  the  first 
section  of  this  chapter,  namely,  "  Fluctuations  in  the  Mar- 
*'  ket  Price  of  Silver."    My  reasons  for  omitting  its  discus- 


so 

sion  in  that  place,  are,  first,  the  circumstance  just  mention- 
ed, namely,  it  being  a  sub-cause  only,  coming  under  a  more 
general  rule  ;  second,  I  wished,  for  the  sake  of  perspicuity, 
to  confine  our  disquisitions  to  the  metalhc  value  of  our  cur- 
rency ;  and  third,  its  real  importance  demanded  notice  by  it- 
self. 

We  shall  now  be  better  able  to  understand  the  question 
of  the  real  exchange,  wiiich  will  accordingly  form  the  sub- 
ject of  the  third  section  of  this  chapter. 


Section  III. — The  real  Exchange.  y 

The  two  sections  just  completed,  are  devoted  to  the  con- 
sideration of  the  circumstances  by  which  the  nominal  Ex- 
change is  liable  to  be  affected.  We  are  now  prepared  to 
understand  the  real  exchange,  or  that  premium  or  discount 
which  is  generated  by  the  circumstances  of  supply  and 
demand. 

The  exports  of  every  country  form  its  purchasing  power 
— the  fund  by  means  of  which  it  supplies  itself  with  those 
commodities,  w  hich  it  is  either  wholly  unable  to  produce,  or 
at  least  cannot  produce,  so  advantageously  as  purchase. 
The  value  of  tliese  exports  has  to  be  drawn  for — this  then 
forms  the  supply  of  bills  of  exchange.  The  demand  is 
created  by  the  necessity  of  paying  for  imports.  When, 
therefore,  the  imports  and  exports  amount  to  the  same  sum 
— when  in  other  words  the  debts  and  credits  are  equal,  the 
real  exchange  will  be  at  par.  But  it  must  evidently  be  of 
rare  occurrence  that,  in  any  country,  the  imports  exactly 
balance  the  exports.  It  is  the  difference  which  creates  the 
real  exchange  ;  let  us  seek  an  illustration.  The  year 
1830  was  one  of  extraordinary  production  in  America.  Of 
wheat  and  flour  especially,  the  surplus  was  very  great. 
The  advancing  averages  in  England  offered  every  induce- 
ment to  export  as  early  as  possible  ;  the  spring  export  of 
grain  and  flour  in  1831  was  accordingly  greater  than  in 
any  previous  year.  The  drafts  for  these  shipments  come 
into  the  market  early  in  the  season,  even  before  the  open- 
ing of  the  navigation,  and  as  when  the  importation  com- 
menced, it  was  found  to  be  by  no  means  excessive,  the  real 
exchange  continued  at  a  discount  in  New  York  up  to  the 
middle  of  April,  and  in  Canada  up  to  the  middle  or  latter 
end  of  June.     Indeed,  in  New  York,  it  sunk  to  7|  per 


51 

cent,  {h  per  cent,  discount)  in  June  after  having  been  above 
par  (8  per  cent.) — see  Appendix. 

By  looking  at  B  2  (Appendix)  it  will  be  found,  that  the 
par  value  of  our  currency  was  8  per  cent,  premium,  during 
1831.  Indeed  from  August  to  December  the  par  sunk,  by 
the  advance  in  the  price  of  silver  and  the  consequent  en- 
hancement of  our  currency  to  7|  ;  up  to  the  middle  of  April 
the  average  rate  of  exchange  was  6^' — ranging  from  6  per 
cent,  to  7§.  Correcting  these  rates  by  8  per  cent,  the  par  at 
the  time,  we  have  real  Exchange  li  discount,  with  a  range 
from  2  to  |  per  cent. 

Of  the  total  exportation  of  the  United  States  of  America, 
cotton  alone  forms  nearly  one  half  *  say  i-o"o  •  Of  course,  the 
effects  of  fluctuations  in  the  quantity  exported  of  so  impor- 
tant an  article  as  cotton  are  most  marked  ;  accordingly  we 
find  that  a  deficiency  in  the  exports  of  cotton  shows  itself  at 
once  on  the  exchanges  in  the  shape  of  an  advance;  an  in- 
crease in  the  export  on  the  other  hand  produces  the  opposite 
effect,  while  there  existed  every  inducement  to  export  wheat 
and  flour,  the  state  of  the  cotton  market  in  England  was  far 
from  encouraging.  This  state  of  the  market  combined 
with  a  low  rate  of  exchange  did  away  with  all  inducement 
to  ship,  and  by  the  1st  July,  the  exportation  of  cotton  was 
106,061  bales  deficient  compared  with  1830.  This  carried 
with  it  its  own  remedy.  The  supply  of  bills  of  exchange 
fell  short  of  the  demand — their  price — the  rate  of  exchange 
— accordingly  rose  above  10  per  cent,  or  deducting  the 
nominal  exchange,  more  than  two  per  cent. 

Over  a  certain  point,  however,  the  real  exchange  cannot 
advance — it  is  subject  to  its  own  peculiar  limit ;  what  that 
limit  is,  is  by  no  means  difficult  to  discover. 

"  It  is  very  easy  to  see,  what  is  the  limit  to  the  price  of 
"  bills,  called  in  the  language  of  merchants  the  exchange. 
"  The  motive  to  the  purchase  of  a  bill  is  the  payment  of  a 


»  Cotton, 2G,COO,000 

Wheat,    Flour,  &c G,000,000 

Tobacco, 5,000,000 

Rice,  2,500,000 

Pork  1,500,000 

Timber, 1,700,000 

Other  small  articles 12,400,000 

55,700,000 
-American  Almanack,  1830, 


S2: 

"  debt.  The  merchant,  however,  on  whom  it  is  incum* 
"  bered  to  pay  a  debt  in  Holland,  can  pay  it  without  a  bill, 
"  by  sending  the  metal.  To  send  the  metal  is  attended  with 
"  a  certain  cost.  If  he  can  obtain  the  bill  without  paying 
"  beyond  this  cost,  he  will  purchase  the  bill.  This  cost, 
"  therefore,  is  the  utmost  amount  of  the  premium  which  he 
"  will  pay  for  a  bill,  and  tite  limit  to  the  rise  of  its  price. 
"  As  the  cost  of  sending  the  metal  which  is  a  great  value  in 
"  a  small  bulk,  is  never  considerable,  the  (real)  exchange 
"  can  never  vary  from  par,  to  a  considerable  amount." 
{MiWs  Political  Economy^  M  Edition,  p.  187.)  The  truth 
of  the  above  doctrine,  wdiich  Mr.  Mill  has  so  happily  and  logi- 
cally expressed — will  at  once  be  acknowledged  by  every 
practical  merchant.  There  is  scarcely  one  of  us,  who  has, 
not  occasionally  made  it  a  matter  of  calculation  whether  it 
would  not  be  better — more  profitable,  all  circumstances  con- 
sidered— freight  and  insurance  incurred,  less  interest  saved 
— to  pay  for  our  imported  goods  with  coin  rather  than  with 
bills  of  exchange  at  high  rates.  And  when  our  determina- 
tion has  been  in  favor  of  an  exportation  of  the  precious  me- 
tals, it  has  invariably  been  because  the  expense  of  transmis- 
sion has  been  something  less  than  the  rate  of  exchange. 

Every  exportation  of  coin  or  bullion,  takes  out  of  the 
market  a  demander  of  exchange,  accordingly  we  find  that 
when  the  transmission  of  the  precious  metals  has  gone  on 
for  some  time,  an  effect  on  the  exchange  is  the  consequence 
— a  decline  takes  place,  until  it  reaches  a  point  at  which, 
exportation  ceases  to  be  attended  with  profit, — is  no  longer 
a  saving  ;  and  then  it  stops. 

I  have  already  stated,  that  above  a  certain  point  the  real 
exchange  cannot  long  continue,  being  limited  to  the  cost  of 
transmitting  the  precious  metals.  As  that  cost,  however,  is 
subject  to  variation,  it  follows  that  the  point  above  alluded* 
to  is  by  no  means  stationary. 

It  is  chiefly  by  an  increase  of  freight  and  insurance,  that 
the  cost  of  transmitting  the  precious  metals  is  enhanced. 
It  may  be  well  therefore  to  state  the  leading  circumstances 
usually  operating  upon  freight  and  insurance.  They  are 
first,  distance  ;  second,  season  ;  third,  war  ;  there  is  also  a 
fourth  cause  independent  of  freight  and  insurance,  namely 
legislative  interference. 

First,  Between  countries  situated  with  respect  to  each 
other,  as  are  England,  France,  Holland,  Germany,  &c.  the 
expenses  of  freight  and  insurance  are  exceedingly  small,  be- 


3:5 

twcen  those  countries  accordingly  the  real  exclian2;e  is  also 
small ;  and  moreover,  owing  to  the  facility  of  distributing 
the  supply  of  bills  between  the  chief  connnerciai  cities  in 
the  exact  proportion  required,  very  steady.  Between 
countries  situated  at  a  greater  distance,  as  England  and 
Anierica,the  expenses  are greater,exchange  will  accordingly 
be  found  to  lluctuate  to  the  more  extended  limit. 

Second,  In  the  summer  season  when  freight  and  insu- 
rance, especially  the  latter,  are  low,  in  the  absence  of  other 
impediments,  the  cost  of  transmission  from  America  will  be 
small,  perhaps  not  over  H  to  I2  per  cent,  that  is,  making 
allow  ance  for  the  saving  of  interest  on  the  thne  a  bill  would 
have  to  run.  In  the  winter  season,  however,  freight  and  in- 
surance may  both  advance  to  an  extent  to  enhance  the 
cost  of  transmission  to  fully  3  or  4  per  cent.  If  a  simulta- 
neous decline  take  place  in  the  price  of  silver,  so  as  to 
advance  the  par.  above  the  ordinary  level,  it  may  happen 
that  13  or  14  per  cent  premium,  will  scarcely  fullil  the  con- 
ditions of  an  exportation  of  the  precious  metals.  This  was 
the  case  in  the  winter  of  1823,  the  price  of  silver  was  low  in 
Kngland,  making  our  par  9^  per  cent,  so  that  allowing  3|  per 
cent  for  winter  cost  of  transmission,  it  would  require  ex- 
change to  have  advanced  to  13|  or  14  per  cent  before  an 
inducement  would  exist  to  prefer  an  exportation  of  dollars 
to  the  purchase  of  a  good  bill.  Throughout  1823,  however, 
the  state  of  export  and  import  favored  a  low  exchange,  so 
that  the  operation  of  the  check  was  never  required.  As 
a  further  illustration,  but  in  an  opposite  direction,  I  take 
the  state  of  things  last  year,  (1831,)  By  the  higher  price 
of  silver  our  currency  was  raised  in  value,  requiring  only  8 
percent  (instead  of  9^')  to  raise  it  to  the  nominal  par.  The 
rate  of  exchange  in  July,  August,  and  September,  ranged 
from  9|  to  10|  per  cent  premium,  shewing  a  mean  real  ex- 
change of  2|  per  cent.  An  exportation  of  coin  accordingly 
-took  place  to  the  extent  of  $5,000,000,  without  having  any 
material  immediate  elfect  on  the  exchange  ;  lor  in  the  (b!- 
lowing  month  exchange  rose  to  II  per  cent.  Freight  and 
insurance,  however,  was  rising  to  their  winter  rates,  hence 
the  limit  was  extended.  The  two  remaining  circumstances 
allecting  the  cost  of  transmitting  the  precious  metals  do  not 
require  to  be  treated  at  great  length. 

Third,  War,  "It  appears  from  the  evidence  annexed  to 
"  the  Report  of  the  Bullion  Committee,  that  the  expense 
"  of  carrying  gold  from  London  to  Hamburg,  w  hich  pre- 

E 


34. 

"  viously  to  the  war  only  amounted  to  2  or  2|  per  cent,  had, 
*'  in  the  latter  part  of  1809,  amounted  to  7  per  cent,  shovv- 
"  ing  that  the  limits,  within  which  fluctuations  in  the  real 
"  exchange  were  confined  in  1809,were  about  three  times  as 
"  great  as  those  within  which  they  were  confined  in 
"  1773." — Supp.  Encyc.  Brit.  art.  Exchange. 

It  is  easy  to  see  that  the  chances  of  suffering  from  the 
"  acts  of  the  King's  enemies,"  as  the  policies  have  it, 
are  greatly  augmented  by  distance ;  here  war  would  pro- 
duce much  more  marked  effects  on  the  exchanges  of  Ame- 
rica, than  of  European  countries. 

Fourth.,  The  effects  of  legislative  restrictions  in  the 
way  of  a  free  exportation  of  the  precious  metals  have  al- 
ready been  treated  of  in  the  previous  section ;  as  they  in- 
crease the  cost  of  transmission,  so  they  extend  the  limit  of 
the  real  exchange. 

When  exchange  has  advanced  sufficiently  to  fulfil  the 
conditions  of  an  exportation  of  the  precious  metals,  then 
comes  into  operation  another  result  productive  of  a  decline 
in  the  exchanges.  I  mean  an  increased  activity  in  the  ex- 
port trade  generally. 

I  would  here  remark  that  exportations  of  coin,  bullion, 
produce  or  manufactures  produce  their  effects  in  the  same 
way.  First  J  by  diminishing  the  demand  for  exchange,  as 
when  an  importing  merchant  remits  the  precious  metals  or 
produce,  instead  of  buying  a  bill  of  exchange  ;  Second,  by 
increasing  the  supply,  as  when  produce  and  coin  or  bul- 
lion are  shipped  in  the  ordinary  way  and  drawn  against. 
Still,  however,  it  is  the  same  phenomena,  though  brought 
about  by  the  agency  of  different  classes  of  men. 

In  the  spring  of  1831,  as  we  have  seen,  exchange  was 
low.  Exportation,  accordingly,  was  checked  in  all  those 
commodities  upon  which  the  state  of  the  consuming  markets 
did  not  operate  as  an  inducement.  The  falling  off  of  cot- 
ton alone  was  very  great — at  one  time  exceeding  in  value 
six  millions  of  dollars.  Demand  for  exchange  continued 
the  same ;  but  as  the  supply  was  diminished,  exchange  ad- 
vanced. It  advanced,  as  we  have  seen,  to  a  height  suffi- 
cient to  furnish  the  motive  to  transmit  the  precious  metals ; 
it  did  more, — it  supplied  another  motive, — it  made  the  ex- 
portation of  commodities  profitable.  An  article  which, 
when  exchange  is  at  If  below  par,  would  be  shipped  to  a 
moderate  extent  only ;  would  be  extensively  shipped  when 
exchange  was  at  2  per  cent  premium.     Such  was  the  case 


35 

with  cotton.  The  tlcficiency  which  at  the  end  of  June  was 
156,000  bales,  compared  with  the  previous  year,  was  gra- 
dually reduced,  till  at  the  end  of  September, — the  close  of 
the  cotton  year, — the  deficiency  came  under  70,000  bales.* 

We  have  seen  that  the  increased  cost  of  transmitting  the 
precious  metals  towards  the  winter,  stopped  the  export  of 
coin  before  it  had  brought  down  the  exchange.  What  the 
exportation  of  bullion,  however,  was  unable  alone  to  ac- 
complish, it  succeeded  in  doing  aided  by  the  continued 
shipments  of  cotton.  In  November,  exchange  at  New 
York  on  London  began  to  decline,  and  during  the  winter  it 
continued  at  about  9|  per  cent.  In  June  of  the  present 
year,  the  exportation  of  cotton  had  recovered  itself,  so  that 
it  exhibited  an  increase  compared  with  June  1831,  exactly 
equal  to  the  deficiency  of  that  period  compared  with  June 
1830, — hence,  exchange  would  have  decHned,  had  it  not 
been  for  an  increased  importation,  with  a  diminished  ex- 
portation of  flour  and  other  articles,  f 

The  exchange  between  Canada  and  New  York  is  pure- 
ly a  real  exchange.  The  currencies  of  Canada  and  of  the 
United  States  are  the  same,  under  different  denominations ; 
the  premium  or  discount  thereon,  therefore,  is  regulated  by 
the  principle  of  supply  and  demand,  limited  by  the  circum- 
stances already  fully  described. 

The  demand  for  drafts  on  New  York  arises  from  the  fol- 
lowing circumstances  : — 

First,  A  considerable  portion  of  the  exports  from  Cana- 
da consist  of  ashes,  lumber, 'and  other  productions  of  the 
United  States.  The  value  of  these  exports  has,  for  the 
most  part  to  be  remitted  to  New  York,  and  thus  creates  a 
demand  for  exchange. 

Second,  Produce  is  shipped  from  New  York,  Norfolk, 
&c.  to  the  West  Indies  on  Quebec  account. 

Third,  West  India  produce  is  sold  in  the  Canadian  mar- 
kets to  a  considerable  extent  for  merchants  resident  in 
Newfoundland,  Nova  Scotia,  and  New  Jkunswick,  part  of 
the  proceeds  of  the  same  being  remitted  to  Nev/  York  on 
their  account. 

Fourth,  Remittance  has  also  to  be  made  for  the  pre- 


*  See  Appendix  D. 

f  Since  tliis  was  written,  the  stagnation  of  trnde  resulting  fioni  cholcia  lias 
produced  a  I'^iipurury  decline  in  exchange  at  New  York. 


3G 

iniums  of  insurance  on  policies,  under-written  at  New 
York  for  Quebec  account. 

TIic  supply  of  bills  on  New  York  arises, — 

First,  and  chielly  out  of  the  circumstances  of  a  large 
quantity  of  government  and  private  exchange,  on  London, 
being  sent  to  New  York  to  be  disposed  of,  for  Quebec  and 
Montreal  account ;  Second,  The  losses  at  sea  on  the  risks 
taken  at  New  York  have  to  be  drawn  for. 

If  the  drafts  on  London  for  the  American  produce  sold 
at  and  shipped  from  Quebec  were  at  once  transmitted  to 
New  York,  instead  of  being  sold  in  the  Canadian  markets, 
of  course  the  first  named  source  of  demand  would  balance 
a  considerable  portion  of  the  fi,rst  named  source  of  supply. 

The  second  and  third  sources  of  demand  might  also  be 
considered  to  be  about  sufficient  to  absorb  and  neutralize 
the  remaining  portion  of  the  first  source  of  supply  ;  thus, — 
A  cargo  of  rum  or  sugar  is  to  be  disposed  of  here,  the  pro- 
ceeds of  which  are  to  be  invested  in  produce  at  New  York 
or  Norfolk.  The  merchant  sells  the  cargo,  sends  his  order 
to  his  New  York  or  Norfolk  agent,  buys  a  bill  of  exchange 
on  London,  sends  it  to  his  agent,  and  so  closes  the  account 
without  the  intervention  of  a  draft  on  New  York  in  any 
shape. 

When  the  losses  at  sea  are  placed  against  the  premiums 
paid,  it  is  probable  the  balance  is  not  very  great.  From  all 
these  considerations,  it  appears  that,  on  the  whole  transac- 
tions, the  drafts  and  credits  between  New  York  and  Cana- 
da will  about  balance,  and  the  money  rate  of  exchange  on 
the  average  will  be  at  par.  I  say  money  rate  of  exchange, 
because  when  exchange,  taking  the  circumstances  of  sup- 
ply and  demand  alone  into  consideration,  should  be  !\tj)ar, 
and  would  be  so  if  paid  in  cash,  a  premium  of  1  to  IJ  per 
cent  is  given,  in  consideration  of  the  seller  granting  a  long 
credit  to  the  buyer  ;  this  premium,  therefore,  must  be  con- 
sidered rather  as  a  guarantee  commission  than  as  a  pre- 
njium  of  exchange. 

Supposing,  then,  that  the  debts  and  credits  between  Ca- 
nada and  the  United  States  nearly  balance,  and  that  the 
rate  of  exchange  on  the  average  is  at  par, — that  is,  fluctu- 
ates as  much  one  way  as  the  other, — allowing  for  the 
"  guarantee  commission"  already  described, — it  follows, 
that  the  rate  of  exchange  at  any  particular  time  will  be  re- 
gulated by  the  rate  of  exchange  at  New  York  on  London. 
At  this  moment  the  transmission  of  bills  to  New  York 


would  lie  allondetl  with  loss;  few  or  none  arc,  (horefore, 
sent,  and  the  supply  ol"  bills  on  New  York  in  conse(iuenco 
is  sn)all.  The  rate  has  accordin<:;ly  risen  to  3  a  4  per  cent 
premium.  In  July  and  August  1831  the  exact  converse 
existed.  Bills  on  London  were  higher  at  New  York  than 
at  Quebec.  A  large  amount  was  sent  tlown,  enough,  in- 
deed, to  bring  the  money  rate  of  exchange  on  New  Yoi  k 
to  a  discount.  New  Yoik  is,  in  fact,  the  money  market  of 
America,  the  great  arbitrator  of"  the  rate  ofexciiange.  To 
her  the  drafts  for  the  cotton  shipments  of  the  South,  as 
well  as  the  bread  stuffs  of  the  North,  find  tlieir  way  for 
sale.  The  leading  circumstances  aftecting  the  real  exchange 
have  now  been  enumerated  ;  it  remains  only  to  add  a  short 
section  on  the  combined  effects  of  the  various,  and  some- 
times conflicting,  circumstances  described  in  the  three  past 
sections. 

Section  IV. — The  Computed  Exchange. 

The  combined  effects  of  the  nominal  and  real  exchange 
have  been  sometimes  called  the  "  computed  exchange  ;" 
with  a  few  remarks  on  which  I  shall  dismiss  this  alieady 
(I  fear)  too  tedious  chapter. 

The  nominal  and  real  exchange  act  sometimes  in  the 
same  direction,  and  sometimes  in  different  directions.  In 
1823,  the  computed  exchange  (actual  rate)  was,  as  exhi- 
bited in  E,  4  of  the  Appendix,  £6  7s.  3d.  per  cent.  In  this 
case  the  nominal  and  real  exchange  operated  in  opposite 
directions ;  the  former,  owing  to  the  exceedingly  low  price 
of  silver,  was  £9  12s.  ll|d.  per  cent  premium;  and  the 
latter,  owing  to  a  very  moderate  importation,  and  a  great 
encouragement  to  exportation,  by  reason  of  the  advances 
in  the  prices  of  almost  all  articles  of  American  produce, 
was  £3  5s.  8d.  discount.  In  this  case  the  computed  ex- 
change expresses  the  diflference  between  the  real  and  no- 
minal exchange. 

In  the  following  year  the  nominal  and  real  exchange 
acted  in  the  same  direction,  the  computed  exchange  ex- 
pressing these  s?»72.9,  namely,  £9  4s.  4d.  per  cent,  being 
made  up  of  nominal  exchange  8  per  cent,  and  real  exchange 
£l  4s.  4d.  per  cent  premium.  On  the  average  of  the  six 
years  ending  1828,  the  nominal  and  real  exchange  was  the 
same,  their  sum  was  the  average  late  ofexciiange  for  the 
period,  namely,  £8  12s.  3(\.   the  value  of  the  cmren<y, — 


38 

the  nominal  exchange  for  the  same  period  was  £8  5s.  4cl. ; 
hence,  the  real  cxcliangc, — that  which  was  generated  by 
the  state  of  supply  and  demand, — w^as  only  6s.  lid.  per 
cent,  or  rather  over  one-third  per  cent  premium.  On  this 
head  no  more  need  be  said  tlian  to  refer  to  Appendix  F. 

In  the  course  of  the  above  remarks  we  have  adopted  the 
language  forced  upon  us, — as  we  have  already  fully  ex- 
plained,— by  the  assumption  of  the  par  of  4s.  6d.  sterling  to 
the  dollar ;  were  that  assumption  abandoned,  and  the  ap- 
proximate par  of  4s.  2d.  the  dollar  adopted,  £100  sterling 
would  be  worth  £120  currency,  on  which  a  premium  of  1 
per  cent  would  be  £1  4s. — of  2  per  cent  £2  8s. — and  so 
forth.  A  computed  exchange  of  £22  8s.  per  cent  would 
t-iien  be, — supposing  the  value  of  the  dollar  undisturbed, — 
composed  of  nominal  exchange  20  per  cent  and  real  2  per 
cent.  I  have  already  endeavoured  to  show,  that  it  would 
obviate  much  misconception  w  ere  all  assumption  of  a  par 
avoided, — were  the  dollar  quoted  at  so  many  pence  and 
eighths  ;  or,  what  amounts  to  the  same  thing,  the  £1  ster- 
ling at  so  many  shillings  and  pence  currency,  as  sovereigns 
are  now  actually  bought  and  sold.  It  would  be  interesting 
could  we  exhibit  the  computed  exchange  during  the  period 
of  the  Bank  restriction :  but  I  have  not  been  able  to  meet 
with  a  record  of  the  actual  rate  of  exchange  in  the  years 
1813  and  1814,  only  knowing  that  it  was  at  a  heavy  dis- 
count. It  has  already  been  explained  that  rather  over  22 
per  cent  discount  was  warranted  by  the  depreciated  state 
of  the  English  currency.  If  at  that  time  exchange  was  at 
a  still  heavier  discount, — say  at  25  per  cent, — it  would 
show  that  the  real  exchange  was  actually  depressed  3  per 
cent  by  the  then  circumstances  of  supply  and  demand. 

If,  on  the  other  hand,  20  per  cent  were  the  rate  of  dis- 
count, it  would  be  equal  to  a  real  exchange  of  2  per  cent 
premium.  As  war  was  at  that  time  being  carried  on  in  the 
European  Seas  on  a  most  stupendous  scale,  the  rates  of  in- 
surances between  the  Continental  States  were  very  high. 
America  seized  the  golden  opportunity  of  annoying  Eng- 
land, while  her  hands  were  full,  hence  American  insurances 
were  still  further  enhanced  and  the  cost  of  transmission, 
pj'o  tantOj  increased  ;  the  limit  of  the  real  exchange  was  ex- 
tended probably  beyond  what  is  usually  supposed.  A  con- 
stant supply  of  army  bills  concurred  with  a  nominal  ex- 
change against  England,  to  keep  the  computed  exchange 
at   a  heavy  discount.      Still  wc    are   inclined  to  believe 


59 

that  the  real  exchange  was  at  a  considerable  premium. 
This,  however,  is  mere  surmise,  introduced  merely  to 
show  how  such  things  might  be.  I  liave  been  unable, — as 
I  have  already  stated, — to  meet  with  any  documents  from 
which  I  could  learn  any  thing  of  the  then  rates. 

CHAPTER  III. 

On  the  Introduction  of  British  Silver  as  the  Money  of  Cir- 
culation, and  the  Pound  Sterling  as  the  Integer  of  Account. 

To  assimilate  the  currency  of  the  colony  to  that  of  the 
mother  country  seems  to  have  been  a  i'avourite  project 
with  both  Committees,  and  also  with  most  of  the  witnesses 
examined.  In  the  sight  of  many  merchants,  too,  connected 
with  the  home  trade,  it  hath  also  found  favour  ;  chiefly,  it 
should  seem,  because  calculation  would  thereby  become  fa- 
cilitated. I  cannot,  however,  discover  that  it  was  ever 
contemplated  to  make  British  silver  the  only  current  mo- 
ney ;  it  was  merely  to  form  the  basis  ;  all  the  coins  now  cur- 
rent to  be  freely  exchangeable  at  rates  to  be  determined  by 
the  wisdom  of  the  Legislature.  Supposing  the  value  of  all 
other  coins  compared  with  the  Spanish  dollar  to  be  known 
and  fixed,  it  would,  of  course,  only  remain  to  declare  at 
what  rate  the  dollar  should  be  exchangeable  for  British  sil- 
ver. 

Before  T  go  into  this  question,  connected  with  that  of 
the  possibility  of  keeping  British  silver  in  the  Province,  I 
beg  to  offer  to  the  most  serious  consideration  of  the  reader 
a  few  observations  on  the  general  question  of  the  expedien- 
cy of  such  a  change  in  our  currency. 

Of  the  money  of  account,  the  denomination  would  be 
unchanged.  We  should  still  contract  debts  in  pounds,  shil- 
lings, and  pence ;  but  we  should  contract  them  in  pounds, 
shillings,  and  pence  of  greater  intrinsic  value ;  hence,  to  ac- 
quire the  sanje  nominal  sum,  we  should  have  to  give  more 
value — more  of  the  produce  of  labour  for  it. 

In  parting  with  commodities  sellers  ought  to  content 
themselves  with  a  nominally  lower  price — lower  by  the 
greater  value  of  the  money  received,  say  20  per  cent ;  and 
buyers,  in  the  case  supposed,  ought  to  use  the  greatest  cau- 
tion in  their  purchases,  paying  say  20  per  cent  less  than  be- 
fore. Thus,  suppose  rum  to  be  selling  for  2s.  Gd.  a  gallon 
in  the  present  currency,  it  would  be  worth  only  2s.  Id.  in 


40 

the  new  and  more  valuable  currency.  Now  all  this  is  both 
tlicoroticaliy  and  practically  true  ;  and  if  every  individual 
in  the  country  could  be  made  acquainted  with  it  at  once, 
not  the  slightest  inconvenience  could,  by  any  possibility, 
follow  the  proposed  change.  Prices  would,  as  it  were, 
nominally  jump  down  at  once,  and  so  remain  really  and  in- 
trinsically the  same ;  and,  if  the  measure  were  to  be  ac- 
companied by  a  retrospective  law,  declaring  that  antece- 
dent contracts  not  completed  should  be  at  the  proportion 
of  £100  oX  the  new  currency  for  every  £120  of  the  old,  all 
would  be  done  that  the  nature  of  the  case  would  require. 

In  the  answers  of  the  several  gentlemen  examined  by  the 
Committee  of  the  Council,  as  to  the  question  of  expediency, 
no  very  steady  conception  of  the  nature  of  the  inconveni- 
ence to  be  apprehended  appears  to  have  been  entertained. 
Their  fears  seem  to  have  had  reference  rather  to  existing 
contracts,  than  to  mischief  in  bringing  the  measure  about ; 
though  it  must  be  evident,  that  as  far  as  unfulfilled  contracts 
are  concerned,  inconvenience  might  be  fully  obviated,  by 
declaring  so  much  of  the  new  currency  to  be  worth  so 
much  of  the  old.  The  real  source  of  disturbance  shall  be 
presently  explained  ;  in  the  meantime  I  beg  to  submit  to 
tiie  reader  the  substance  of  the  answers  made  by  the  seve- 
ral witnesses  to  the  following  very  important  question  : — 

-'  Are  you  of  opinion  that  it  would  be  advisable  and  be- 
"  neficial  to  assimilate  the  money  of  account  and  circulation 
"  with  the  money  of  account  and  circulation  of  the  United 
"  Kingdom,  and  if  so,  for  what  reasons  ?" 

The  gentlemen  examined  were  the  Cashiers  of  the  two 
Banks,  Mr.  Simpson  and  Mr.  Freer ;  Mr.  Finlay,  Mr.  Le- 
mesurier,  and  the  late  Mr.  Leather,  merchants  ;  and  the 
late  Mr.  Keys,  a  dealer  in  exchange. 

Mr.  Simpson  doubted  the  expediency  of  the  measure,  and 
spoke  very  decidedly  of  the  inconvenience  that  would  attend 
the  change,  at  least  for  a  time* 

Mr.  Freer  was  not  certain  that  it  would  be  beneficial,  he 
apprehended  that  so  great  a  change  would  be  productive  of 
inconvenience. 

Mr.  Finlay  spoke  in  its  favor,  but  thought  it  should  be 
applied  to  all  the  Colonies  ;  he  further  expressed  his  opin- 


*  Mr,  Simpson's  answers  throughout,  are  marked  by  superior  knowledge  o£ 
the  subject. 


41 

ion,  that  as  to  the  money  of  chculation,  it  matters  little  of 
what  it  consists,  &c.  provided  its  intrinsic  value  in  British 
sterling  were  correctly  fixed. 

Mr.  Lemesurier  is  decidedly  of  opinion,  that  the  measure 
in  question  would  be  beneficial  and  expresses  no  fear  of 
inconvenience. 

The  late  Mr.  Leather's  evidence  appears  to  be  against 
the  measure,  among  other  reasons,  because  it  would  injuie 
vested  interests.  "  I  may  instance  it  by  myself,"  he  said, 
"  I  have  a  long  lease  of  property  at  a  rate  of  rent  payable 
"  in  tlie  current  money  of  the  Province,  to  which  the  pro- 
"  posed  bill  would  add  largely." 

Mr.  Keys  expressed  his  doubts  of  the  expediency  of  the 
measure,  on  the  ground  of  the  inconvenience  and  confusion 
which  must  ensue. 

It  will  be  observed  that  Mr.  Finlay's  opinion  is  in  favour 
— Mr.  Lemesurier's  strongly  in  favour  of  the  measure,  and 
the  other  gentlemen  are  more  or  less  against  it,  though  some 
clothe  their  dissent  in  the  language  of  doubt.  It  is  worthy 
of  remark  also,  that  all  mention  "  inconvenience"  as  a 
ground  of  objection,  though  not  one  endeavours  to  describe 
that  inconvenience,  an  omission  which  I  shall  now  attempt 
to  fill  up.  In  the  first  section  of  the  preceding  chapter,  we 
have  seen,  that  in  point  of  relative  value  sterling  is  to  cur- 
rency as  £100  to  £120.  Hence  in  a  change  from  the  latter 
to  the  former,  prices  should,  and  indeed  would,  fall  one  sixth. 
But  would  they  do  so  at  once? — I  answer — No. 

The  price  of  an  article,  as  we  all  know,  is  regulated  by 
the  free  competition  of  buyers  and  sellers.  Sellers  will, 
generally,  take  the  current  rate  of  the  market,  but  they  will 
at  the  same  time  be  on  the  alert,  to  avail  themselves  of 
every  advantage  which  the  circumstances  of  the  times  afford 
to  obtain  an  advance  thereon.  A  buyer.  A,  from  a  distance 
comes  into  town  either  totally  ignorant  of  the  change,  or 
but  ill  informed  of  its  extent.  He  finds  that  the  rum  for 
which  a  week  before  his  neighbour  B,  had  paid  2s.  6d.  his 
merchant  offers  to  him  at  2s.  3d.  or  2s.  4d.  the  change  having 
tak^rt  place  in  the  meantime,  he  buys  it  as  a  bargain,  not 
having  been  informed  that  he  should  only  have  paid  2s.  Id. 
for  it.  At  length  the  day  of  payment  arrives,  B,  satisfies 
his  creditor  with  2s.  Id.  in  the  new  currency,  because  he 
contracted  his  debt  before  flic  change  took  place.  A,  on 
the  other  hand,  finds  himself  obliged  to  pay  the  price  he 
had  engaged  to  pay,  because  forsooth  he  contracted  his 

r 


42 

debt  it  is  assumed  with  his  eyes  open.  Of  course  A,  is  only 
deceived  once,  and  as  a  knowledge  of  the  matter  spreads 
around,  the  inconvenience  subsides  ;  the  difference  of  the 
two  currencies  would  soon  become  understood,  and  seller 
after  seller  would  reduce  his  price,  till  at  last  the  theory 
would  be  verified. 

I  have  not  as  yet  shown  all  the  evil  which  would  accom- 
pany such  a  change.  A  low  price  promotes  consumption — 
an  apparently  low  price  will  do  the  same  thing.  Rum  at 
2s.  3d.  say,  following  2s.  6d.  would  induce  the  country 
buyers  on  credit  to  enlarge  their  stoclrs.  Stocks  in  first 
hands  would  accordingly  diminish.  This  would  be  accor.  - 
panied  by  a  real  advance  in  the  price  of  the  article.  Impor- 
tation would  l)e  encouraged  to  an  extent  to  reduce  the  price 
of  the  article  below  the  natural  level,  and  most  probably 
involve  merchants  in  losses,  greater  than  their  first  gains  as 
above  described.  Coincident  upon  such  losses,  are  mercan- 
tile failures ;  if  numerous,  aflfecting  public  confidence  and 
credit  and  reacting  still  further  upon  prices  to  an  extent  to 
produce  what  is  usually  called  revulsion,  a  state  of  things 
to  be  avoided  by  all  possible  means. 

There  can  I  think  be  no  doubt,  that  all  sellers  would  for 
a  time  be  benefitted,  by  the  delay  which  would  take  place 
before  prices  assumed  the  new  level,  and  among  the  rest  the 
Sellers  of  Labour.  Wages  would  not  at  once  subside. 
Those  who  employed  labourers  w  ould  have  in  fact  more 
to  pay  than  before  ;  but  as  the  price  of  the  produce  would 
be  in  continual  process  of  reduction,  profits  would  be  less. 
The  change  of  money  would,  therefore,  act  as  a  most  unfair 
tax  on  profits.  Wages  are  now  quite  sufficient  to  support 
the  labourer  in  comfort,  any  further  advance  would  not  be 
desirable,  as  it  would  tend  to  substract  from  the  induce- 
ments— already  too  few — to  the  introduction  of  capital  into 
the  colony. 

From  a  very  careful  consideration  of  the  question,  I  am 
fully  of  opinion  that  it  would  require  more  than  two  years  to 
adjust  prices  and  quantities  to  the  new  standard  ;  so  long  a 
period  of  disturbance  and  fluctuation,  appears  to  me  a  very 
strong  argument  against  any  change  in  the  money  of  ac- 
count. I  do  not  affirm  that  it  should  decide  the  question, 
but  if  more  can  be  urged  against  the  measure,  and  nothing 
but  facility  of  calculation  in  its  favor,  I  do  contend  the 
project  should  be  wholly  abandoned.  On  the  question, 
whether  British  silver  would  be  more  likely  to  remain  in- 


,43 

Canada  than  Spanish  and  American  doHars,  four  \vitncsses 
out  of  seven,  were  of  opinion  tliat  it  would,  provided  the 
Spanish  dollar  were  made  exchangeable  for  it  at  4s.  2d. 
These  were  the  Commissary  General,  he  said  4s.  Id.  to  4s. 
2d.  Mr.  Finlay,  Mr.  Lemesurier,  and  Mr.  Freer.  One, 
namely,  Mr.  Keys,  was  equally  decided  that  British  silver 
would  not  remain  in  the  country.  The  late  Mr.  Leather 
was  doubtful,  and  lastly,  Mr.  Simpson,  whose  opinion  de- 
serves recording,  for  the  clear,  though  necessarily  abridged 
views  it  contains,  gave  it  against  the  measure,  he  said,  (1) 
"  Our  calculating  neighbours  of  the  United  States  *  always 
*'  take  their  returns  for  produce  sold  in  Canada,in  such  money 
"  as  will  pass  to  best  account  in  the  United  States.  So  that 
"  (2)  British  silver  at  its  intrinsic  worth  would  just  be  as  like- 
"  ly  to  disappear  from  the  Province,  as  any  other  description 
"  of  coin  at  a  proportionate  rate  ;  but  if  (3)  British  silver  is 
"  declared  by  law  to  be  a  legal  tender,  at  a  rate  much  above 
"  its  intrinsic  value,  then  there  is  little  doubt  but  it  will 
''  remain  until  all  other  descriptions  of  coin  disappear.'-  f 

It  appears  to  me  to  be  capable  of  proof,  that  British  silver 
would  not  permanently  remain  in  the  province  if  fixed  at 
4s.  2d.  the  dollar,  as  recommended  by  the  four  first  wit- 
nesses. In  giving  this  opinion  so  diametrically  opposite  to 
such  authority,  I  feel — I  cannot  say  diffidence,  because  the 
labour  I  have  given  and  the  evidence,  precludes  the  exis- 
tence of  doubt  on  my  mind — but,  a  considerable  degree  of 
anxiety  to  exhibit  clearly  to  the  reader  the  reasons  for  that 
opinion. 

We  have  seen  that  4s.  2d.  the  dollar,  is  what  we  call  8 
per  cent  premium.  We  have  also  seen  that  when  exchange 
advances  to  about  10  per  cent,  specie  begins  to  leave  the 
country,  and  further,  that  in  1831,  this  state  of  things  took 
place  to  a  considerable  extent.  In  the  present  state  of  the 
American  currency  specie  is  exported  chiefly  in  the  form 
of  Spanish- American  and  Mexican  coin,  and  of  such  small 
parcels  of  English  money,  as  can  be  from  time  to  time  laid 
hold  of. 

It  may  be  easily  shown,  that  on  an  advance  in  the  rate  of 
exchange  to   10  per  cent  and    upwards,     British  silver 


•  The  same  would  be  done  by  any  other  people. 

t   As   Mr.   Simpson's  evidence  coutaius  ihicc  dibtiuct  propositions,   I   have 
marited  them  J,  2  and  3. 


44 

would  be  more  desirable  as  an  exportable  commodity 
than  Spanish  dollars.  The  value  of  Spanish  and  other 
Foreign  coin,  is  ever  fluctuating  with  the  varying  state  of  the 
bullion  market,  consequently,  the  exporter  of  dollars  must 
take  into  consideration  this  liability  to  decline  ;  in  calcula- 
ting, a  small  per  centage,  let  us  suppose  |  per  cent,  must  be 
allowed  for  that  contingency.  But  British  silver  is  liable 
to  no  such  fluctuation  in  the  home  market,  it  will  be  worth 
to  the  exporter  rather  more  than  dollars  ;  it  will  conse- 
quently bear  a  premium.  If  the  estimated  liability  to  dechne 
be  supposed  |  per  cent,  then  it  is  likely  the  premium  of 
British  silver  would  be  J  per  cent.  Buyers  and  sellers 
would,  as  in  other  cases,  divide  the  profit  between  them, 
subject  of  course  to  the  usual  modifications  of  supply  and 
demand. 

It  has  not  unfrequently  happened,  that  in  the  course  of  two 
or  three  months,  five  or  six  millions  of  dollars  have  been  ex- 
ported from  New  York  alone.  The  whole  volume  of  the  Ca- 
nadian currency  is  probably  not  3,000,000  *  including  Upper 
Canada,  certainly  not  4,000,000  :  hence,  in  times  of  gieat 
demand  similar  to  that  of  1831,  all,  or  nearly  all  the  money 
of  Canada  would  disappear,  and  we  should  again  return  to 
our  present  currency,  which  fortunately  would  be  the  full 
extent  of  the  evil. 

It  is  quite  true  that  the  converse  state  of  things  might  hap- 
pen, that  a  low  exchange,  say  5  or  6  per  cent,  as  we  have 
seen  occur,  would  induce  an  importation  of  British  silver, 
always  saleable,  be  it  remembered,  at  8  per  cent  but  when 
we  consider  that  on  the  state  of  the  exchanges  warning  us 
to  export, — exportation  takes  place  immediately,  but  that 
on  the  other  hand  a  warning  to  import  cannot  be  obeyed  in 
less  than  three  months,  no  man,  I  think,  could  desire  to  see 
British  silver  the  money  of  circulation.  America — the  ■ 
possessor  of  the  mines — is  in  fact  our  natural  source  of  sup- 
ply. From  the  mines  all  America  first  supplies  itself,  the 
surplus  being  constantly  exported. 

If  bills  of  exchange  were  usually  drawn,  bought,  and  sold 
in  London,  on  the  American  cities,  as  well  as  in  the  Ame- 
rican cities  on  London,  the  argument  would  not  be  so  strong. 
There  would  be  a  rate  of  exchange  in  London  to  regulate 
exportation  of  British  silver  to  America,  and  a  rate  of  ex- 


*  See  Chaptei  vi.  lor  a  calculation  of  the  amount  of  current  money  iu  Lower 
Canada. 


45 

change  in  America — as  now — to  regulate  the  cxj)oi  tation  of 
British  silver  and  other  specie  to  London.  Such  a  stale  of 
things  exists  between  the  several  European  states.  But  we 
should  still  have  distance  to  favour  a  (luctuation  between 
the  extremes  of  abundance  and  scarcity.  On  this  head  I 
need  say  no  more.  Of  course  if  the  dollar  were  rated 
higher,  say  at  4s.  4d.  it  would  not  require  an  advance  in  the 
exchanges  above  the  ordinary  level  to  drive  every  shilling 
of  British  money  out  of  America  ;  I  owe  £100  in  England, 
dollars  sell  there  at  4s.  2d.  hence  I  must  send  home  480  to 
pay  my  debt;  but  I  can  buy  British  silver  enough  to  pay 
my  debt  for  402^  dollars — hence  the  17-3  4  dollars  would 
he  the  inducement  to  export  British  silver,  instead  of  dollars. 
I  say  nothing  of  expense  of  transmission,  because  it  would 
be  the  same  in  both  cases  ;  nor  do  I  make  any  allowance 
for  the  certainty  of  the  value  of  the  British  silver — the  un- 
certainty of  the  value  of  the  dollar  in  the  home  market,  these 
considered  as  inducements,  having  been  lully  treated  of. 

I  must  now  beg  the  reader  to  turn  back  to  page  43,  and 
read  once  more  Mr.  Simpson's  evidence.  Proposition 
3  would  be  fulfilled,  were  the  value  of  the  Spanish  dollar  to 
be  rated  as  low  as  4s.  Id.  or  4s.  in  other  words  were  British 
silver  rated  as  high  as  10^  or  12|  per  cent  premium. 
This  would  be  in  effect  making  British  silver  a  depreciated 
currency.  Prices  would  advance  ;  the  nominal  exchange 
would  be  against  us,  that  is  our  par  would  be  a  nominal 
premium  expressive  of  the  depreciate,  say  2|  a  4^  per 
cent,  and  we  should  not  be  relieved  of  our  surplus  coin — a 

{)erfect  nuisance  when  in  excess — until  the  real  exchange 
lad  advanced  to  2  per  cent  and  upwards  above  the  nomi- 
nal exchange,  in  other  words  to  12$  and  over,  in  the  case  of 
4s.  Id.  being  fixed  ;  to  141  and  over,  if  4s.  were  fixed.  Dol- 
lars of  course  we  should  never  see,  unless  some  unfortunate 
ignorant  were   to  introduce  a  few. 

Importers,  during  the  period  of  the  introduction  of  British 
silver  at  the  above  rates,  would  have  to  fight  against  an  ad- 
vancing nominal  exchange,  prices  would  be  some  time  in 
adjusting  themselves,  as  shewn  at  page  41,  only  in  the  op- 
posite direction,  and  in  the  meantime  the  whole  class  would 
be  suffering  enormous  loss — a  portion  thereof  ruined. 

In  the  I3ritish  Parliament  and  elsewhere,  we  often  hear 
men  talk  of  the  danger  of  "  tampering"  with  the  cur- 
rency. The  term  is  often  used  by  men  whose  conceptions 
are  extremely  vague,  and  whose  knowledge  of  the  subject  is 


46 

scanty.     Here  let  it  stand  for  the  disturbance  which  this 
Chapter  is  attended  to  avert. 

1  would  not,  however,  exclude  the  free  introduction  of 
British  money  ;  and  if  the  change  proposed  in  proposition 
No.  iv.  of  the  next  Chapter  were  carried  into  etfect,  there 
can  be  no  doubt  that  both  gold  and  silver  would  circulate 
inconsiderable  quantities,  especially  with  the  present  emnii- 
gration.  All  I  wish  to  show  is,  that  no  forcible  means  should 
be  resorted  to  to  introduce  British  silver ;  and  still  less  should 
any  change  take  place,  which  would,  even  for  a  time,  dis- 
turb prices. 

CHAPTER  IV. 

REMEDIES. 

The  intelligent  reader  will  have  already  perceived,  that 
the  currency  of  this  Colony  requires  but  little  *  to  put  it  into 
as  sound  a  state  as  any  currency  is  susceptible  of.  That 
httle  it  is  the  object  of  the  present  Chapter  to  point  out.  I 
shall  put  the  remedies  in  the  form  of  propositions,  explain- 
ing such  as  do  not  appear  to  have  come  within  the  province 
of  the  foregoing  Chapter. 

I.  That  it  is  expedient  to  call  in  the  French  crown  pieces 
and  half  crown  pieces,  at  the  public  expense. 

n.  That  the  above  coins  be  called  in  simultaneously,  at 
Quebec,  Montreal,  and  Gaspe,  and  that  the  time  of  paying 
such  coins,  at  their  present  current  rates,  be  limited  to  four- 
teen days  from  the  first  notice. 

HI.  That  the  French  half  crowns  be  re-issued  at  2s.  6d. 
but  that  the  French  crowns  be  exported  as  bullion,  be- 
cause of  their  intrinsic  value  (5s.  4|d.)  being  extremely 
awkw  ard  calculation. 

IV.  That  from  and  after  six  calendar  months  from  the  date 
of  the  Act,  the  par  of  exchange  be  assumed,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  calculation,  at  what  is  now  called  8  per  cent  pre- 
mium, that  is,  at  20  per  cent  difference  between  sterling 
and  currency,  in  other  words  that  £100  sterling  be  consi- 
dered equal  to  £120  currency ;  the  rules  of  conversion 
being 


*  1  mean  as  far  as  relates  to  the  coins  in  circulation  ;  before  we  can  plume 
(jurselves  on  our  sjeady  currency,  we  rc<iuire  a  reform  in  our  banking  system. 


47 

To  CONVERT  Sterling  into  Currency,  add  one  fifth. 
To  convert   Currency  into   Sterling,  deduct    one- 
sixth.* 

V.  That  the  following  coin  be  deemed  a  legal  tender  to 
any  amount,  at  the  rates  below  specified  : 

Spanish  and  American  dollai-s ."Js, 

Do.         do.     do.  half-dollars  and  Freiicii  half- >  ^        , 

Clowns V  ^"^  ^'^• 

F.nglish  crown  pieces  (see  IV.) (is. 

Do.  half-crowns  do 3s. 

Sovereio;ns  do £.[  4s. 

Half-sovereigns  do I2s, 

VI.  That  the  following  coins  be  deemed  a  legal  tender  to 
the  extent  of  ten  dollars  only,  at  the  rates  below  specified  : 

Spanisli  and    American  quarter  dollars Is.  Sd. 

Spanish                                ei-^hth       do 7^d. 

Do.                                  sixteenth  do 3.|d. 

American    ten  cent  pieces 6d. 

English  shillings,  coined  since  1817 Is.  2d. 

Do.     sixpences,    do.       do.     do 7d. 

Spanish  one-fourth  dollar  without  pillars Is. 

Pistareens Is. 

VII.  That  in  all  payments  exceeding  ten  dollars,  the  re- 
ceiver shall  not  be  compelled  to  take  any  of  the  above  small 
coin,regulation  Vi.  being  intended  to  provide  fora  subsidiary 
coinage,  and  so  facilitate  small  purchases  and  payments. 

VIII.  That  an  importation  of  copper  coin  be  provided  for 
— coined  expressly  for  the  use  of  the  Colony  to  the  following 
extent. 

Of  penny  pieces,  three  tons 
Of  half  penny  pieces,  five  tons. 
That  the  penny  pieces  be  made  to  weigh  8  dwts.  each, 
and  the  half-penny  pieces  4  dwts.  which  will  produce 
201,600  pieces  of  1  penny, 

672,000  pieces  of  a  half-penny,  being  about  5d.  for  every 
family,  or  merely  Id.  for  every  individual  in  the  Province. 


*  As  the  Crown  duties  are  ca'culated  according  to  a  different  rule,  it  would  be 
well,  were  the  Legislature  to  introduce  a  clause  to  protect  the  i)cople  against 
anyattempUat  illegal  taxation  by  the  Grown  authorities,  l>y  a  sudden  adoption 
of  this  rule. 


48 

IX.  That  Ihc  al)Ove  be  a  legal  tender  to  the  extent  of 
FiVE  Shillings  only. 

The  above  nine  propositions,  appear  to  me  to  include  all 
that  is  necessary,  in  order  to  remove  the  evils  which  have 
been  described.  I  shall  conclude  the  Chapter,  with  some 
few  observations  on  each. 

The  first  proposition  has  been  already  explained  in  the 
1st  Chapter.  The  number  of  days  named  in  the  second  pro- 
position, appear  to  me  quite  sufficient  to  enable  all  the 
French  coin,  to  find  their  way  to  either  of  the  places 
named,  within  the  time  specified.  The  provision  for  the 
exportation  of  the  French  crowns  as  bullion,  was  inserted 
.it  the  suggestion  of  Mr  Simpson.  The  reason  for  the  sug- 
gestion requires  no  explanation  ;  its  force  will  be  apparent 
to  any  practical  man.  It  may  be  remarked,  that  by  ship- 
ping the  coin  in  the  summer,  when  insurance  is  low,  and 
drawing  when  exchange  has  advanced  to  the  winter  rates, 
an  actual  saving  may  be  effected  of  probably  half  and  per- 
haps even  all  the  loss  of  calling  in  the  French  crowns. 

No.  IV.  is  proposed  only  as  a  second  best  course,  be- 
cause there  exists  a  strong  prejudice  against  the  better  plan 
of  adopting  the  American  subdivision  of  the  dollar  into 
cents.  Except  as  greatly  facilitating  calculation,  however, 
it  is,  as  we  have  already  seen,  not  very  important.  The 
change  recommended,  is  absolutely  necessary  as  shown  in 
section  I.  of  the  second  Chapter. 

The  propositions  V.  VI.  and  VII.  will  act  as  a  perfect 
guarantee  against  depreciation.  In  the  present  state  of  the 
currency,  VI.  would  be  wholly  inoperative,  inasmuch  as 
small  coins  are  very  scarce  ;  hardly  a  sufficient  quantity 
exists  for  the  small  exchanges  of  the  cities  ;  and  so  far  from 
being  forced  to  take  even  ten  dollars  worth,  it  is  quite  a 
matter  of  favor  to  obtain  them.  To  remedy  this  deficiency 
it  is  proposed  to  restore  the  pistareens  to  circulation  by  en- 
hancing its  value.  We  should  then  have  an  influx  of  about 
£25,000  of  a  most  useful  coin,  which  with  the  other  small 
coins  in  circulation  would  probably  be  sufficient  as  subsi- 
diary coins,  at  least  for  a  few  years.  By  limiting  it  to  ten 
dollars  as  a  legal  tender  it  would  never  produce  inconve- 
nience. It  would  pass  just  as  British  silver  now  does  in 
England,  namely,  rated  above  its  value,  but  limited  both  in 
its  whole  quantity,  and  as  a  tender.  The  only  difference  in 
the  cases  would  be,  that  British  silver  is  rated  10  per  cent, 
above  its  value,  whereas  the  pistareens  would  only  be  7| 


49 

per  cent  above.  Even  granting  that  tlicsc  depreciated  pis- 
tareens  produce  their  worst  possible  effects  on  the  currency, 
what  will  it  amount  to  ? — Calling  the  whole  currency  half 
a  million  and  the  pistareens  £25,000  depreciated  7^  per 
cent  spread  over  the  whole,  it  would  just  amount  to  ^  per 
cent. 

The  necessity  of  an  importation  of  copper  coin  must  be 
obvious  to  every  one,  not  a  more  wretched  copper  coinage 
— if  coinage  it  can  be  called — exists  any  where  ;  and  yet,  de- 
based as  it  is,  its  value  is  enhanced  by  scarcity  about  2}^  per 
cent,  such  being  the  price  the  banks  have  been  glad  to  procure 
it  at.  From  Birmingham,a  neat  and  tasty  Colonial  coin  might 
be  obtained  at  the  expense  named  in  the  next  Chapter, 
namely,  £1116,  and  by  making  it  weigh  one  third  less  than 
the  English  coin,  a  profit  might  be  made  of  it  to  help  to 
pay  the  loss  on  the  French  coin.  By  keeping  its  quantity 
down,  it  would  never  be  requisite  to  call  proposition  IX.  into 
operation.  If  eight  tons  were  found  insufficient,  more  might 
be  struck  during  the  following  year. 

CHAPTER  V. 

EXPENSE  OF  CALLING  IN  THE  DEBASED  COINS. 

Throughout  these  papers,  the  principle — that  the  loss  in- 
curred by  calling  in  the  worn  coins  should  be  borne  in  equal 
shares  by  every  individual  in  the  community — has  never 
been  lost  sight  of.  This  only  can  be  attained  by  calling  them 
in  at  the  expense  of  the  local  government  ;  to  ascertain 
what  that  expense  will  be  is  the  object  of  this  chapter. 

As  a  necessary  preliminary  we  must  enquire  what  quan- 
tity of  coin  exists  in  Lower  Canada.  The  only  estimate  I 
can  find  of  the  whole  sum  of  coined  money  in  Canada,  is 
contained  in  the  evidence  of  Mr.  Commissary  General  Routh, 
before  the  Committee  of  the  House  of  Assembly.  In  reply 
to  the  question,  "  Have  you  formed  any  conjecture  as  to 
"  the  whole  amount  of  Foreign  coins  in  Lower  Canada,"  he 
said,  *'  Calculating  that  there  are  about  100,000  fomilies  in 
"  Lower  Canada,  and  that  each  may  have  four  or  five  dollars 
"  in  specie,  and  that  the  Military  chest  would  require  as 
"  much  more,  and  the  Receiver  General  and  the  Banks 
"about  half  that  amount  {Qy.  each,)  I  should  infer  that 
"  the  circulating  medium  for  this  country  should  be  about 

II 


50. 


"  £250,000  to  £300,000  sterling  :"  putting  (he   above  into 
"  figures,  we  have 

100,000  families  at  4|  dollars  each £113,500 

Banks 56,250 

Receiver  General , 56,250 

Military  Chest 112,500    • 

4337,500 

On  the  above  estimate  we  have  to  remark,  that  the  only 
item  subject  to  doubt  is  the  first,  it  evidently  depends  on  the 
average  quantity  of  silver  the  head  of  each  family  is  in  the 
habit  of  keeping  in  his  possession. 

We  require  no  vague  opinion  as  to  the  quantity  of  money 
in  the  hands  of  the  Receiver  General,  or  in  the  vaults  of  the 
Banks,  documents  furnish  us  with  those  important  facts. 

For  the  contents  of  the  Military  Chest,  we  could  have  no 
better  authority  than  its  keeper. 

With  regard  to  the  money  possessed  by  the  Canadian 
population,  I  am  inchned  to  think  the  Commissary  General's 
estimate  far  too  low  ;  instead  of  five  dollars  I  should  be  in- 
clined to  say  it  w-as  nearer  ten  dollars  on  the  average.* 

The  money  in  the  Receiver  General's  Chest,  I  take  from 
Appendix  A  ;  that  table,  however,  does  not  furnish  a  fair 
criterion  of  the  average  cash  in  the  hands  of  the  Banks. 
The  periods  were  chosen  by  Mr.  Holmes,  f  as  stated  in  his 
letter,  because  they  enabled  him  to  give  the  proportion  of 
each  coin,  accounts  being  taken  at  those  periods  by  order  of 
the  Directors.  The  average  amount  of  cash  in  their  vaults 
I  take  from  Appendix  N,  Journals  of  Assembly,  1830,  and 
M.  1831.  :j: 


*  If  I  were  confined  to  the  French  population,  I  should  say  twelve  or  fourteeu 
dollars  rather. 

t  See  Report,  p.  12. 


1  Statement  of  cash  in  the  vault 
of  the  Montreal    Bank,  average 
of  each  year  and  of    five   years. 

Cash  in  the   vaults  of  the  Quebec 
Bank,  average  of  each  year  and 
of  four  years. 

1821 

1822 
1823 
1824 
1825 

71624 
96823 
76453 
90232 

82988 

1826 
1827 
1823 
1829 
ISSO 

86540 
68660 
62104 
63537 
*70543 

1823 
1824 

1825 
1826 

9100 
12947 
16200 
14258 

la27 
1823 
1829 
ISSO 

15111 

16444 
1.5040 
19683 

Average 
,)f  5  yrs. 

8S62t 

70277 

Average 

of  4  yrs. 

13126 

16568 

*  Average  of  thie?  months  only. 


Tlic  second  peiiod  of  both  Banks  is  chosen,  as  indicating 
hiorc  I'airly  than  the  first  the  present  state  of  the  currency. 

Calculating  on  the  several  data  above  specified,  we  obtain 
the  Ibllowing  result : — 

In  the  Military  Chest,  ...  .; 112,500 

In  the  Public  Chest,« 83,000 

In  the  Montreal  Bank,  70,277 

In    the    Quebec    Bank,  10,568 

100,000  families  having  ^10  each 250,000 

JK532,235 

In  page  4  of  the  Report,  Mr.  Commissary  General  Routh 
states,  "  that  no  coins  are  received  into  the  Military  Chest 
"  except  dollars  and  half  dollars  and  English  money,"  hcnco 
in  taking  the  proportions  as  exhibited  in  Appendix  A,  we 
must  reject  the  contents  of  the  Military  Chest,  which  will 
leave  us  £420,000  as  a  total,  of  which  French  crowns  and 
half  crowns  bear  their  proportion,  as  exhibited  by  the  above 
table. 

The  pistareens  have  been  already  unwisely  dismissed  the 
Province,  it  remains  therefore  to  estimate  the  cost  of  call- 
ing in  the  French  coin  only,  and  re- issuing  them  at  their 
intrinsic  value. 

We  have  seen  that  French  crowns  form  -r^^a  of  the 
whole  circulation  of  Canada,  this  will  be  found  to  give 
£55,862,  their  actual  depreciationis  2\  per  cent,  making  the 
amount  of  loss  £1260. 

Of  half  crowns  the  proportion  is  i^f  o  amounting  to 
£31,500,the  percentage  depreciate  Oj-o  per  cent,  and  the  loss 
£2866. 

Something  remains  to  be  added  for  expense  of  manage- 
ment. I  have  no  doubt  but  that  the  Banks  would  gladly 
undertake  it  for  A  per  cent.  The  trouble  of  exchanging 
about  £85,000  to  £90,000  would  be  extremely  trilling,  for 
which  £450  would  amply  remunerate,  or  should  su(  h  a 
course  be  preferred  or  the  Banks  refuse  the  business,  it 
might  be  done  by  a  Commissioner  of  k»f>wn  integrity  in 
Quebec  and  Montreal,  with  proper  checks  in  Iho  shape  ol 
an  obligation  to  account  daily  to  an  Auditor,  and  deposit  his 
balances  in  the  Banks. 


*  The  average  is  perhaps  itithcr  below  this. 


5^ 

To  recapitulate  : — 

Loss  on  French  crowns ^I2G0 

Do.  do.    half  crowns 2866 

Expenses  of  management 450 

The  act  of  calling  in  the  copper  coin  and  re-issuing  a 
new  Colonial  coin,  would  be  by  no  means  an  expense,  it 
would  probably  leave  a  profit. 

8  tons  of  copper  a  d£88 f  704 

Dies 30 

Striking 60 

Freight  and  Insurance 36 

Commission  and  Management 100 

Sterling ^930 

Currency 1116 

The  above  would  issue  as  follows  : — 

201,600  pieces  of  one  penny jE840 

672,000  pieces  of  one-half  penny 1400 

^2240 

I  do  not  think  there  is  more  than  £1000  of  copper  coin 
in  Lower  Canada,  worth  perhaps,  if  sold,  about  £250  to 
£300.     The  account  will  stand  thus 

First  cost  of  the  new  copper  coin ^1116 

Old  coin  called  in 1000 

^2116 

New  issue £2240 

Sale  of  old  coin 250 

2490 

Net  profit £274, 

Every  new  issue  would  be  attended  with  a  profit  of  100 
per  cent  on  the  outlay. 

As  truth  is  the  only  object  in  this  publication,  it  may  be 
well  to  point  out  to  the  reader  the  sources  whence  error 
may  have  sprung  in  the  above  estimate. 

Firsts  The  whole  amount  of  coin  in  the  country,  exclu- 
sive of  the  Military  Chest,  may  have  been  under  estimated. 

Second,  The  proportion  which  the  crowns  and  half 
crowns  bear  to  the  whole  circulation,  may  not  be  exactly 
indicated  by  Appendix  A,  the  habitans  having  a  greater 
proportion.  It  is  within  my  knowledge,  however,  that  the 
habitans  prefer  dollars  and  half  dollars  to  crowns,  and  half 
crowns,  repeatedly  asking  at  the  banks  for  Vargent  Ang- 
lais, as  they  designate  all  not  French.    It  may  be,  that  there 


is  scattered  among  them  more  than  £250,000,  but  I  am 
most  decidedly  of  opinion,  that  the  ad(Hti()n  will  be  in  dol- 
lars and  half  dollars,  and  so  tend  to  diminish  the  propor- 
tion of  the  debased  coins. 

Another  consideration  too  on  the  favorahle  side  of  ex- 
pense, is  that  there  are  perhaps  not  more  than  70,000  or 
80,000  families  of  French  extraction  in  Canada,  and  it  is 
.  among  them  only,  that  hoarding  to  any  extent  exists.  Judg- 
ing from  myself  and  the  friends  around  me,  I  should  say,  the 
English  inhabitants  of  towns  seldom  keep  more  than  one  or 
two  dollars  in  specie  in  their  possession.  From  all  which  it  is 
concluded,  that  if  there  be  errors  in  my  estimate,  one  will 
correct  another  ; — that  the  French  money  in  circulation  and 
hoarded,  does  not  exceed  £90,000  currency,  and  that  the  ex- 
pense of  calling  it  in,and  of  re-issuing  the  half  crowns  at  their 
intrinsic  value,  and  of  exporting  the  crowns  as  bullion,  as 
recommended  page  46,  on  account  of  their  inconvenient 
value,  would  be  considerably  under  £5000.  The  advan- 
tages, however,  of  having  a  steady  circulating  medium,  are 
so  inconceivably  great,  that  even  were  the  expense  much 
more  formidable,  I  cannot  conceive  it  would  for  a  moment 
be  allowed  to  weigh  with  a  Legislature  having  the  welfare 
of  the  country  at  heart ;  and  it  is  to  be  hoped,  that  the  Re- 
presentative of  the  Crown  will,  at  the  opening  of  the  com- 
ing Session,  call  the  attention  of  the  Commons  once  more  to 
the  subject  ; — that  the  Commons  will  institute  a  new  en- 
quiry into  the  facts  ; — and  thereon  ground  a  Bill  calculated 
to  effect  the  end  desired.  Let  us  hope  also,  that  no  paltry 
jealousies  of  party  will  be  allowed  to  stand  in  the  way  of 
the  final  adjustment  of  this  most  important  matter.  That 
the  French  and  English  Canadians  can  have  interests  really 
opposed  to  each  other,  I  doubt,  nay  I  think  it  would  not  be 
difficult  to  show  that  it  is  impossible.  If,  however,  there 
be  any  real  or  supposed  difference  of  interests  between  men 
livhig  in  the  same  country — warmed  by  the  same  sun  and 
chilled  by  the  same  blast — merely  because  their  fathers 
spoke  a  diflferent  language,  such  difference  of  interest 
clearly  does  not  lie  in  the  settlement  of  the  Canadian  Cur- 
B^NCY  Question. 


Appendix. 


A.  Statement  of  the  average  amount  of  each  denomination  of  coin  in  posses- 
sion of  the  Montreal  and  Quebec  Banks,  in  IS28  and  1S29  ;  and  in  the  Publis 
Ciiest  on  the  1st  of  January,  1829* 

B.  1,  Price  of  standard  silver  in  bars,  in  London,  from  1823  to  1831,  (omit- 
ting 1829  and  1S30,)  monthly. 

2.  Annual  averaj^e  value  of  the  Spanish  dollar,  (deduced  from  B.  1.)  Ave- 
rage for  the  whole  period,  wiili  corresponding  par  value  of  the  currency. 

C.  Table  of  the  annual  average  depreciation  of  the  English  currency  during 
the  period  of  the  Bank  restriction. 

D.  Rlonthly  exports  of  Cotton  from  the  United  States,  from  May  18S0  td 
1st  September  i8i32,  with  current  rate  of  exchange  at  New  York  annexed  to 
each  month. 

E.  Exchange  transactions  of  the  Montreal  Bank,  1821  to  1829,  from  the 
Assembly  Journals,  18S0,  Appendix  N. 

1.  Sales  of  their  drafts  on  London. 

2.  Purchases  of  private  exchange. 

S.  Purchases  of  Government  exchange. 

4.  Monthly  rate  of  exchange  at  Quebec,  1821  to  1883. 

5.  Abstract  of  Nos.  1,5,  and  S,  showing  tlie  aggregate  average  premiums 

on  each  class  of  transactions — for  each  year  and   for   the   whole 
period. 

6.  Summary. 

E.     Table  shovping 

1.  Par  value  of  the  currency  from  B,  1.  1 

2.  Actual  rate  of  exchange  from  C.  4. 
S.  Real  exchange,  being  the  difference  between  1  and  2.  f"^  ^ 

4.  Par  value  of  £100  sterling  in  currency,  from  column  1.  I    o  ^ 

5.  "Value  of  JElOO  sterling  at  the  actual  rate,  from  column  2.       J  jij  ■" 
"With  averages  and  real  exchange  for  the  period. 

G.     Rate  of  exchange  at  New  York,  1820  to  1832,  weekly. 


55 


'-'^ 


S^ 


■^'?? 


■5  a 

^=5 


s?2 

■§  "^  tf 
"'5  1 

>   «»   lu 

5a; 


o     • 

0 

f-i           r^ 

"o  '-5  3 

5   cj 
u  5  u 
a  o  1^ 

1 

1 

b    ^    u 

««  JT^^ 

■o 

o  = 

J?  o  •  2  -3  _. 

00  cr  (r>  to  »«      i^ 

O   ^^     j?      w  .~ 

1 

1            0           (N    TT   -   _•  ^           rjJ 

0 

•^     v/,  S.   **     ° 

1 

CIJ         tts  t^  «o         Tj« 

0 

fc.  SPS*^  u 

to       « 

0 

f"  .=   •-    o 

r-^l         1 

to  0 

»       ST)       C<lt^o;oias--r-c 

1         -H 

Total 

wo  Ba 

and 

Publii 

(  hest 

G-1  o    1  (Tl       o  —  :?>  o  >o  1^  s^  n 

rj              ,3, 

m  1^  ^ 

i<    1  -^ 

to  (35  -^  G^  X>  U3 

l.O 

u;  £>3          CJ          1— 1 

4a 

H 

1 

t>    . 

^ 

(H  -^ 

Ji          to          CO  to  lO          Oi  — • 

CO 

i;  o 

lO  P 

T 

O          1^  t^  0          0  l~- 

C^ 

3  3 

3  .« 

5!  ^ 

=^55 

^       1??       0  yi  <?^    1  r-.  "o    1 

1         ^ 

3  J3 

^          I^          r-.  TrS  0     1    M            1 

1           CO 

c^;^ 

-*  .- 

-1            lO           -H 

M 

•-S 

o  = 

^§-^^ 

era               10  1^  P3                  (?^ 

2"  3  a 

I 

- 

-1          10  5W  0  ■*  -#      I       r-( 

0 

1 

f^         „  (-,  ^         ^1 

0 

<0           rl  p-« 

0 

•So,           1 

1-^ 

•> 

^ 

OS  c 

■>           (M          <0-<t!.050           I^I? 

^         -< 

3=«| 

I^  'S. 

3       'J*       Tj<-tcjo'n       Cii. 

a       (M 

H5    f£,     J£ 

3        CO        0  0  Oi  G^  —     1 

Oi 

o   o  "-• 

5            'i\            10    to   rl           <S\       \ 

X) 

H      5 

» 

\          SQ 

^ 

o 

ca 

o     . 

O     CO 

CO  -^ 

1       ^-       0  r~  v^  —  r-      t^ 

-f< 

i:  — 

PS  "■ 

J          00          W5  .0  tc  ^  -1          (?^ 

(N 

j3     .— 

C    rt 

=^5:5 

1         Tji         to  MICO         •*     1 

'         CD         <-l                               1 

-H 

, 

W5 

OS 

o-S 

0  "J- 

lO          to  ■*  05  00  M                C 

J      r^ 

M    c 

*^  — 

>o       r~  CO  (N  CO  ^             sr 

J      05 

•"    G 

2  o 

T^       tn  to  —  r^  r-    1     1 

0 

5  =i 

?^  n 

Tfl         fr;  u»  ^          ^ 

os; 

a>   C 

c 

c< 

M 

fS, 

: 

- 

:     *« 

a 

o 

U 

1       : 

C 

o 

c 

a 

V 

■      CO 

o 

h 

•    K 

jn           *^ 

•    Sj 

_a, 

c 

'.    0 

CA      Ui 

?;  S  £  rt   : 

o 

«. 

c   0     ■ 

3 

"o 
Q 

13 

0 

u       1-  ■-  ■-  w  .E  — 

"a 

(^ 

a 

.3 

'13 
en 

3 
CO 

56 


--       ^       <o  -i; 

CO 

1       OJ 

a>   .• 

Ki-fl        HM'^.l(np>i"  .0 

rW) 

«  _5 

->  «  (M  —  —  <M     1     1  (N 

eo 

3  "o 

^  '^   ^  '*T  ''J'    ^                    ^^ 

^ 

00 

«2 
—   o 

i  = 

ro^-n 

"-«--, 

1>    u 

O    3    >>l 

(ro^u;!Oh-COCr>0— 1 

S'S 

a.  "5  ," 

C^  (?^  M  CI  C^l  <M  <M  I'S  SO 

£  *■  - 

CO  ^J  0-j  CO  Jl'  X>  Jj  M  (S> 

o 

U-.101  <-laj         t-loj  .-Ix  HM  Ho) 

^^ 

f-i-^C  —  —1— ip-OOOOC 

3                      !-< 

^ 

en 

rl  f^           r-l  .-1  -^  — 1 

'-' 

o 

, 

00 

1— 1 

r}lTiiw?T:fi'^TJ''<i<l'3>OUltOU>      1       -"a 

•* 

1    "^ 

1 

OS 

1 

OO 

d 

i-( 

ra 

_a 

00 

1 

"« 

1 

"3 

^ 

o^ 

S? 

(Tl 

.P 

CO 

to 

■2 

1 

"<j 

CO 

o 

;5; 

mIot  mIcd  ►*#  ^Tf  Mt^coi^  lOtainloo  i~lo3  f-loj  r(aD  r- 

^ 

*«•» 

CO 

OOOOO-^— 1— '— '  —  —  - 

•4              *'™ 

OD 

cn 

(Tl 

■^                rH 

IM 

o 

CO 

U5>OlOiOLOT}<TiiTJl.*^T*r; 

h                ^ 

o 

<«< 

-* 

00 

xtt  Hi^  -ilisHe*  Hl^nl-*  .■oMml't  -no  N'*  -Im  ►- 

0)             «|,t 

CO 

ffO 

1^ 

„_„„_^_^oooc 

>               —1 

CO 

<?1 

CO 

■^■*-*y<"*'*-*-«}(W5lOlOU 

i-H 
5             •* 

■—1 

'S" 

1 

00 

He)  Hic)-<1(N  -H|c)  Hic<  MHi             nhf 

Ola. 

<r^K 

s 

to 

ooo— <'^— "'^— «o-<^- 

H               rH 

o 

G^ 

^               pH 

CO 

1^ 

cn 

r-H 

u5U5iO'J<'i<Ti<'^-*-<3<T#^.^ 

f               -* 

^ 

I-H 

s 

00 

HclMCTMh*  "W        Hi-*  -^ks  "1* 

MS 

r^_ 

1^ 

^ 

l-O 

OOOOrt-H—iO-HrH— (>- 

O 

"IS 

00 

s 

<^ 

I-l  ■— ( 

6^ 

•H 

o 

CO 

lOK5*OU5lOr}l'<#lOiniOU5U- 

lO 

s. 

tP 

CO 

^ 

o 

HiSHS        H'M        ->H4nwi        MIS '-•iS  HS -<t 

:<          i-Ico 

c 

■^ 

„r-.-I^O-H«OOOOC 

^-" 

ff^ 

Si 

<?^ 

f-H   p^   r— *  f-H            l-H    '"' 

F^ 

o 

^ 

CO 

^■^^-*vn,j(^iou5io»ou" 

^ 

>* 

CO 

00 

HIS  rt*  nMi 

^_ 

HS 

8 

CO 

^H 

H^ 

•-H 

00 

I-l 

r— ( 

rH 

<M 

•*Ti(-}l,j(^,i(r#-*'Tjl  <*•*■!} 

Tj< 

Hf 

Ci 

,         1 

o 

-•^J-^ 

(^J^ 

t*- 

V      . 

O      * 

3      • 

3   : 

^  i 
u      * 

^ 

^ 

c>    . 

^  : 

K 

a 

ho    • 

bfi  o" 

o 

o 

c    ; 

=  a 

^ 

§ 

:>. 

5 

u   <u 

>>  i-' 

-5    •_•  J3  X 

<i:> 

O     oJ 

2    3 

> 

< 

-i> 

•>  5 

c 

i 
fit 

bJO 

o 

s 

i  ° 

o 

;i 

S 

3    = 

< 

c 

c 
1^ 

e 

< 

m 


O.ii 

u 

i>< 

^S 

Q 

0    « 

Vi 

H  a: 

» 

»=;  •>- 

^ 

t< 

Ph 

ft,"" 

< 

«  8 

^< 

■»•  "a 

^^ 

_e   Si 


icu 


^"^ 


•SEi 

5i  ?  >j 


to  tJ  o 
■"  a  u 

V    u    . 


o  .^  "S  >. 


^-  o  ci  o  o  M  M  (n  n  o  o 


<   O, 


=  y ;: 


o  ■- 


^s-s. 


W 


:Mioo<ooi<SOOOOo 


*=       I— 1  I— 1  i-^  -H  "-^ 


Oo5ocy>OOCOCDCOOOOOC/3CO 


«4 


a30(N<NINC^«WW«3 


OOC^C^G^tWNC^C^S^f^ 


^.ooc^ooooooo« 

4{OOC5C505C50l03Ci05CO 


^00000000000 

•  l^iOTj-OOOOOOOO 


3  ^ 


t>. 

^ 

l\ 

'< 

en 

5 

fH 

tS 

>-. 

o 

d 

At 

3 

U 

^ 

\^ 

it 

~  i 

p  o 


5:  ?? 


13  u 


H 


58 


C/3 


«C,    s^ 


"r^ 


S       »5 


5» 


a  a 

Pi    ^ 


ee      eeeeeee 


>.       &    . 

1       S 


^"2 


S-2 


CCt^OCOiOlOOO 
I— 1  >-<  -H 

u-jM  Q  Q  e  e  Q  e  «  e 

M|*».|<»MlcJrS*  rim    -to 


(N  (M  — 1  1^  ■*  (?>  s-o  o  ««1 


t^  .^  1^  CVS  ■* 

(M  tC  U5  CO  1^- 

G^'O  "3  "5  to 
O  to  -*  05  05 

Ci  >o  c^  o  to 


"svaiM— <cDC»t^r^-H<D 

m  (M  to  G-i  03  00  00  to  1^  CO 


.•^oisoor^t^toioojevji— ic<j 
"■oosoioto^ioioror— QOSM-^ 

J!i-*<K)O'-'5OOt>300l-^O'«*<O 

c8a5f^co(ncooo— lOOcocoOT 
*^  ph  i-i(n  as  OT  •*  "o  to  t^  (^ 


m 


■*  o  o  -*  to 

CO  to  -^  O  00 

I     I     I     I  O  CO  to  o  to 

I       I       I    ^  CD  W  CO  00 

r^  O  O)  (?^  CO 
wi  i^  r~  00  00 


3     ' 


§  35  S  5  E'o.-*  :»,«  5^3  iJ 
O  ;zi  fi  1^  Pm  IS  <  g  ^^  "^  <  W 


59 


APPENDIX  E. 

EXCHANC;E    transactions    OV    THK    MONTKliAL    BANK. 

Jfo.  7. — Amount  of  Exchange  sold  by  the  Montreal  Bank  in  each  year, 
from  1821  to  1829  inclusive,  with  the  Aggregate  L'remiums  received,  and 
the  several  rates. 


1821.        1 

1822. 

1823. 

4j 
Amount.   « 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount. 

Aggregate' 
premiums.! 

Amount,   m 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

&. 

£.    s.   d 

£. 

£..    s.  d\ 

£. 

£.  s.  d. 

16650  a    6 

999  0  0 

5000  a 

10 

500  0  0 

2000  a  4i 

90  0  0 

19450  a    6.i 

1264  5  0 

63611  a 

11 

6997  4  2 

20383  a    5" 

1019  3  0 

4142  a    7" 

289  19  9 

1529  a 

Hi 

195  16  S! 

4000  a  5,i 

220  Q  0 

50000  a    7f 

3750  0  0 

43968  a 

12 

5276  3  2 

9833  a  6' 

589  19  7 

31132  a    8 

2492  19  2 

43621  a 

121 

5452  12  6  5000  a    6^ 

337  10  0 

23019  a  8| 

195S  12  4 

30723  o 

13' 

3993  19  10  39193  a  7 

2743  10  2 

6000  a  Sl 

525  0  0 

15855  a 

13i 

2140  8  6!  240UO  a    7.f 

1740  0  0 

18456  a    9 

1661  0  10 

4500  a 

14" 

630  0  0  875S  a    7,i 

656  17  0 

8000  a    9i 

760  0  0 

230  a 

15 

34  10  0  3949  a    8 

315  18  5 

13397  a   10 

1339  14  0 

1917  a   10 

191  14  0 

2335  a  11 

262  7  0 

204  a  12 

2353  a   12.i 

9o8  a  13' 

24  19  7 
294  2  6 
125  16  10 

192681 

15300  18  1209037 

25220  15  10 

122558 

8349  1  1 

1824. 

1825. 

1825. 

Amount,  n 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount. 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

<u 
Amount.  % 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

1863a  8 

148  12  10  32300  a 

5 

1615  0  oj  7500  a    7 

525  0  0 

26786  a    8$ 

2276  16  2  3000  a 

5^ 

157  10  -0  3170  a    8 

253  12  0 

2000  o  8| 

175  0  0  7000  a 

6 

480  0  0]  1050  a  9 

94  10  0 

54037  a    9 

4867  16  7|  13578  a 

7 

950  9  2 

15807  a   10 

1580  14  0 

64359  a  10 

6433  18  0  4000  a 

7,i 

300  0  0 

38  a   lO.i 

3  19  10 

5505  a  12 

6S0  12  o!  17000  a 

7f 

1317  10  0 

23188  a   12.t 

2398  10  0  14624  o 

S^ 

1169  18  5 

25000  a 
7891  a 
32573  a 
35503  a 
29326  a 
7822  a 

Si 
8i 
9 

H 

10 

12.1 

2062  10  0 
670  4  8 

2931  11  5 
3373  1  5 

2932  12  0 
977  15  0 

178293 

17514  5  7230520 

18933  2  1 

27565 

2457  15  10 

1827. 

1828. 

1829. 

Amount,  'rt 

Aggregate 
premiums 

Amount. 

rt 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

at 
'Amount.   » 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

103  a  8 

8  12  10 

7500  a 

9 

675  0  o'  5000  a    8 

400  0  0 

2947  a    8:1 

250  9  11 

7500  a 

9| 

693  15  0  6000  rt  9 

510  0  0 

6034  a    9 

547  11  2 

6325  a 

lo;. 

664  2  G     2850  a    Vi 
2660  12  6  4SOS3  a    9| 

26.1  12  6 

4911  a  9? 

466  10  11 

24750  o 

;^^ 

4367  17  8 

5300  a   lu" 

5.30  0  t 

3000  a 

330  (»  0  .9000  a    9i 

877  10  0 

1 1250  a  UU 

1181  5  (j 

329  a 

12 

.39  9  7  11352  o  10 

1135  4  U 

10361  a  12^ 

1295  2  S 

1860  a 

13 

241  16  0.  13733  a   lO.J 

1441  19  4 

578  a   1 1 

63  II  7 

795  o  11,{ 

91  8  6 

40961 

4279  12  3 

51'264 

5304  15  1 

97391 

9381  3  7 

Xole — The  materials  for  Appendix  R.  Nn,  1  to  j,  are  to  b*"  founH  in  a  paper  laid 
before  the  House  of  Absenibly,  and  ordered  lo  be  jiriutedy  ITtli  .Marcli,  18S0.  See 
Appendix  lo  the  Juiknals  of  llial  year,  letter  iN. 


60 


APPENDIX  E. 

EXCHANGE    TRANSACTIONS    OF    THE    MONTREAL    BANK, 

No.  2. — Amount  of  Merchants'  Exchange  bought  by   the  Montreal  Bankf 
with  the  Aggregate  Premiums  received  and  the  several  rates. 


1821. 

1822. 

1823. 

Amount. 

15 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount.     « 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount. 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

£. 

£.    s.   d. 

*. 

£.    s.    d 

£. 

M.    s.   d. 

4370  a 

3* 

159  19    0 

284  a    5 

14    4    0 

6106  a 

4 

244    4  10 

23G3  a 

5f 

129  19    4 

200  a    8 

16    0    Qj  29165  0 

0 

1312    8    6 

20380  a 

6^ 

1222  16    0 

8945  0    9 

105     1     0 

690  a 

34  10    0 

3940  a 

6f 

400  19    0 

4000  a    9.i 

380    0    0 

7630  a 

^i 

420  15     0 

24739  a 

7 

1731  14    7 

23573  a  10 

2357    6    0 

352  a 

6^ 

21  14    5 

29990  a 

n 

2174    5    6 

149.93  a  Hi 

1724  15    5 

5291  fl 

6f 

330  13    9 

4600  a 

9l 

437    0    0 

12073  0  12 

1448  15    2 

2399  a 

6f 

161  18    8 

5970  fl 

6000  a 

10000  a 

2363  a 

7 
10 

417  18    0 

600    0    0 

1175    0    0 

283  11    « 

94332 

6249  13    5 

64073 

6046    1     7 

75976 

5022  14    4 

1824. 

1825. 

1826. 

Amount. 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

aj 

Amount,     n 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount. 

0 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

763  a 

6,4 

49  18     5 

18064  a    4.i 

812  17    7 

6640  a 

7 

464  16    0 

9790  a 

7 

685    6    0 

24838  a    5 

1241  18    0 

35157  a 

74 

2636    0    6 

9507  a 

7f 

689    5    2 

5460  0    61 

354  18    0 

2226  a 

"^f 

172  10    4 

11716  a 

7I 

878  14    0 

34625  a    7 

2424  15    0 

2330  a 

8 

186    8    0 

11892  a 

8" 

951    7    2 

29136  a    7i 

2075  18  10 

21480  a 

8^ 

1825  16    0 

326  a 

H 

26  17    6 

12778  0    74 

958    7    0 

2380  a 

H 

273  12    0 

7251  a 

4 

616    6    8 

54098  a    8" 

4327  16  10 

8425  a 

9^ 

753    5    0 

535  a    8| 

45    9    6 

9342  a 

Hf 

1050  19    6 

15735  a  11 

1730  17    0 

3907  a 

III 

449    6    1 

12547  0  12 

1505  12  10 

10320  a 

12' 

1338    8    0 

83144 

7449  11  11 

207816 

15478  10    7 

70703 

5559    2  10 

1827. 

1828. 

1829. 

Amount. 

<u 

1 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

<u 

Amount.      « 

CS 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

Amount. 

Aggregate 
premiums. 

5963  fl 

"^i 

430  18    4 

19094  a    9f 

1766     3  11 

5675  a 

6;f 

383     1    3 

3911  a 

74 

293    6    6 

5794  a    9*. 

S.'.O    8     7 

9714  rt 

''i 

692    2    5 

1976  a 

S" 

158    0    0 

4100  a    9J 

3.Q9  15    0 

11724  a 

^ 

849  19  10 

1100  o 

8i 

93  10    0 

10252  a  10 

1025     4    0 

7185  fl 

556  16    9 

2200  a 

8t* 

,192  10    0 

12064  a  lOl 

1236  11     2 

1.3831  fl 

H 

1110    9    7 

980  o 

y' 

88    4    0 

2800  a 

84 

238    0    0 

100  a 

10 

10    0    0 

6600  « 

8^ 

577  10    0 

2381  a 

4 

2S2    2  11 

16229 

1266    8  10 

51304 

4978    2    8 

59950 

4640    2    9 

fJl 


APPENDIX  E. 

EXCHANGE  TKANSACTIONS  OF  THE  MdNTKEAL  HANK. 


yo.  !i.--A7nount  nf  Treasury  Bilh  purchased  bi/  the  Monti eal  Hank,  from 
lb'2\  to  lb2;J  inclusive,  with  the  Aggregate  Fre/niunis  received  and  the 
several  rates. 


1821. 

1822. 

18-23. 

Amount. 

V         Apprefjate 
^        premiums. 

Amount. 

S         Aggregate 
(2         premiums. 

Amount. 

2         Aeeregate 
j3         premiums- 

M. 
13000  rt 
57000  a 
32000  a 

£.    s.    d        M. 
6         900    0    0,  55000  a 
71      4-275    0    Oj  '2:3000  a 
8'     2560    0    0   21000  a 

*.    s     rf 
10       5300    0    0 
Hi      2530    0    0 
12,i     2625     0    0 

£. 

18000  a 
8000  a 
11000  a 

£.    s.   d. 

5  500    0    0 

6  480    0    0 

7  770    0    0 

104000 

7735    0    0   98000 

10655    0    0 

29000 

1750    0    0 

18-24. 

18-25. 

1826. 

Amount. 

i          Aggrepate  Amount. 
^         premiums. 

*;          Aggregate 
j2         premiums. 

AmouDt. 

iJ         Aerpregate 
(3         premiums. 

65412  a 
49034  a 

8  5-234  19    2|     1300  a 

9  4413    1    2   25000  a 

7^         97  10    0 
9'      2-250    0    0 

13-200  a 

■    3900  a 

28733  a 

8        1056    0    0 

91        370  10    0 

10        2873    6    0 

114446 

9648    0    4j  26300 

2347  10    0 

45833 

4-299  16    0 

1827. 

1823. 

1829. 

AmouDt. 

-2          Acjjrepate 
(3         premiums. 

Amount. 

i         Aggregate 
^         premiums 

Amount. 

^         Agcregate 
^         premiums. 

34500  a 

900  a 

11600  a 

4300  a 

8  2760    0    0 
8|          76  10    0 

9  1044    0    0 
10          430    0    0 

5000  a 
27061  a 

10         500    0    0 
lOJ     2909     1     2 

157500  a 

8     12590    0    0 

51800 

4310  10    0 

3-2061 

3409    1    2 

157500 

12590    0    0 

63 


APPENDIX   E. 

EXCHANGE    TIUNSACTIONS    OF    THE    MONTREAL    lUNK. 

No.  4. — Abstract  of  the  three  foregoing  tables,  showing — 

First.  ~'Vhe  amount  of  Exchange  sold  by  the  Montreal  Bank  in  each  year,  1821  to 

1829. 
Second. — The  amount  of  Government  Hills  purchased  during  same  period. 
Third.  —The  amount  of  Merchants'  liills  do.  do. 

Fourth. — Total  of  the  above  transactions  each  year. 

With  aggregate  average  Premiums  on  each  class  of  transactions  and  on  total. 


1821 


1822 


1823 


Description  of 
transactions. 


Annu- 
al 
Amt. 


Aggregate 
premium. 


Exchange  sold...  192681  15300  18  0 
Governt.  bought  104M00  7735  0  0 
Private  ditto.  ...   94382  6249  13 


Exchange  sold  . .  .'209037|25220  1 6  0 
Governt.  bought  9800U 10655  0  0 
Private  do 64073   6046     1 


Rate. 


Total  transactions  of  the 
^y  ea  r. 


7  18  9 
7  8  9 
6  12    5 


Amt. 


Prems. 


29106329485  11    5 


Exchange  sold  ...132558 
Governt.  bought!  29000 
Private  do 75976 


1824  Exchange  sold  . .  .178293 
Governt.  bought|ll4446 
Private  do 83244 


1S25 


1825 


1827 


Exchange  sold... '230620 
Governt.  bought  |  26300 
Private  do 207816 


Exchange  sold ... 
Governt.  bought 
Private  do 


Exchange  sold  ... 
Governt.  bought 
Private  do 


1828   Exchange  sold 

Governt.   bought 
Private  do.  ... 


1829 


Exchange  sold  .. 
Governt.  bought 
Private  do 


27565 
45833 
70703 


12  1  9 
10  17  5 
9  8  8.137111041921  17  7 


237534 


Rate. 


7  9  9 


11  5  10 


15121  15  4  6  7  3 


37598834656  IS  3  9  4  4 


464736,36764  2  7 


7  18    3 


144101 12316  14  10  8  H    0 


40961  4279  12 
51.300  4310  10 
16229   1266    8  10 

51264 
32061 
51303 

97391 
157500 
59960 


108490  9856  10  10 


134628 


314851 


9    18 


14191  19  1010  10  10 


26611    6    9,  8    9    O 


No.  5. — Suinmarij, 


Total  Exchange  sold,  1821  to  1829  inclusive 
Ditto    Government   Exchange    purchased,  ^ 

same  period \ 

Ditto   Private  Exchange   purchased,  same/^ 

period r 


1150375 
688539 

703587 

106746  11  0 
57444  0  5 

56735  9  0 

9  5  7 
8  6  lOJ 

8  13 

2542501 

220926  17  5 

8  13  9 

03 


Q 

w 

a* 


Of 


^S. 


■Si 


bl3_           C» 

=    S            „ 

H^          r'-li                  M^ 

-♦N 

t-  —  =       s 

1^  o  o  a>  o  "3 

31, 

O     •-    -^                c^ 

alue 
0  stc 
lie  ac 
rate. 

colui 

M  1^  CO  M  •*>  'O 

f3 

cc  —  O!  o  —  CI 

O 

—  (N  — 1  T)  51  «M 

<;< 

f»^ 

>. 

^•1     5    = 

Hl.^           HJ  C>lhf  r^.* 

H-l 

1^  o  CT  ^  oi  o 

«.^ 

o    *—         l!      ? 

4. 

Par 

value 

£100  ste 

in 

alifax  cu 

rem  colu 

to  o  o  CO  «j<  o 

— '  O  00  o  o  o 

>.-5 

O 

IM  (n  —  CI  CI  m 

c« 

f— 1   r^^    PI    »—    f^    r-1 

»— * 

53    fH 

TjtCO        -<?'  o 

C^^  to 

00 

_ 

E 

3 

1 

•^ 

1  'J'  C5    1  ^.  o 

?<  o 

F^ 

■•a      1 

e 

1       _,!_,_ 

1 

(i) 

r^  O           OG^ 

>J3  srs 

CI 

o      ' 

B 

OS 

^ 

-^ 

w 

3 

5 

"3 

-a  . 

V 

■g 

cc           o 

"Q 

CO 

o 

c 

lo    1     1  •*    I    1 

o 

u 

II         II 

p^ 

Q 

M                 O 

M 

f*           QO 

M  ■*  CO  «5  00  O 

M-* 

2. 
Actual  1 

-    of 
Exchan 
from 
C.  4. 

1^  Tj"   CO   -^  -H   O 

w  o>  r*  CO  050 

CI  -o 

CD  00 

to 
o  ^ 

^ 

c 

" 

b 

« 

V    "* 

-    S         t*  U    OJ 

H^» 

to  I- 

5  >,  .*  ^  :s 

—  O  t^  Tji  T}i  O 

T}< 

°  o  3  *-■  => 
_;  51  o  w  oj  o 
fti  u  2  „  «;« 

W  O  CO  CO  •*  o 

lO 

W-2 

•i"^lS 

Ol  CO  to  00  CO  CD 

CD 

t:   ci 

rt  •:; 

?        <j   o,  &, 

&> 

d      en 

rt  o 

V 

bi> 

c3 

L^ 

bl 

M  -*  ■'J  to  f^  Cl 

>• 

03 

(N  S^  ff^  CI  "M  (M 

u 

00  ^-  CO  Cf>  00  00 

JH 

(14 


APPENDIX  O. 

Tdhtt'  of  the  Rale  of  Exchange  at  Netv  York  on  Loudon,  1S21  to  1833. 


1         1 
13-21  1822,1823 

182^ 

182  J 

1286 

132- 

1828 
I    10, 

1829  1830 

8J     9i 

!l831 

1     ^'^ 

1832 

93 

1833 

.January.. 

'H 

7 

I      9 

t     ^ 

11 

f 

J    H 

S 

10 

8i 

11 

.   10. 

8 

n 

6i 

■'fl         1 

If 

)     S.I 

7 

f    10| 

^      8| 

11 

10. 

7.i 

9 

6^ 

9i 

2=1 

H 

7j 

\  i^i 

8rF 

11 

lo; 

7^ 

8i 

6| 

93 

Februaiy    J 

H 

"it 

r     9 

^i 

10^ 

10^ 

M 

8| 

'     6.i 

10' 

}■ 

H 

8 

8| 

sf 

10 

lOJ 

8i 

8| 

i    H 

10? 

16 

H 

8 

8i 

8i 

10 

lOg 

8i 

bJ 

6.i 

m 

21 

5j! 

8.^ 

9 

8f 

10| 

m 

B..! 

8,f 

1     6 

n 

March  ...   1 

.5 

8.J 

9 

8| 

m 

Hi 

8-1 

8^ 

:   H 

9J 

fa 

i) 

8i 

^■^ 

8| 

10 

lOj 

81 

■    8^ 

\     Gi 

A 

16 

H 

9 

H 

8i 

10.5 

10| 

8.i 

8 

c? 

9| 

24 

6i 

9 

H 

71 

10| 

'   lOi 

8i 

8 

7' 

9* 

April 1 

H 

s? 

H 

7| 

10. 

lOf 

8 

8 

7| 

P| 

8 

H 

9 

9>i 

8i 

lOi 

lOg 

H 

8 

7| 

9| 

16 

"'h 

9 

Sf 

9.1 

10 

Hi 

8| 

7* 

81 

lOi 

24 

^ 

8J 

Si 

9J 

10 

10| 

9j 

7f 

H 

lol 

Mav 1 

''i 

8| 

8| 

9J 

10 

lO.j 

91 

7 

91 

IO3 

8 

7^ 

9 

7 

9| 

l"i 

lO.i 

9i 

7 

9i 

9.1 

16 

7| 

H 

9i 

6| 

9 

lof 

1C| 

H 

7 

8| 

H 

24 

H 

H 

n 

6 

8i 

iH 

lOi 

H 

7 

71 

91 

Juae 1 

10 

6s 

10 

5 

9f 

H| 

10| 

9i 

7| 

7S 

H 

8 

10 

7 

10 

.T 

9J 

10| 

10  J 

8i 

7 

9 

9i 

16 

9 

6| 

9 

5| 

101 

lol 

10 

8* 

6i 

91 

H 

21 

9 

6| 

8.1 

51 

91 

10 

lOf 

f| 

6| 

9| 

lOi 

July 1 

9 

6 

9 

5| 

9t 

10 

10| 

Si 

6| 

9i 

9| 

S 

9 

6i 

9 

51 

101 

9i 

10| 

9 

6 

io.f 

H 

16 

^ 

6f 

8i 

5 

J  01 

9;| 

10 

y^ 

5J 

9J 

8 

24 

8| 

6.1 

H 

4i 

10^ 

9l 

9,1 

91 

6 

9J 

August...    J 

8f 

6.f 

8.4 

4i 

m 

n 

H 

9i 

6| 

10 

8 

8i 

6| 

l^ 

Si 

iOi 

95 

9| 

'J 

61 

10| 

16 

9 

7 

h 

5,i 

'OJ 

lOi 

10 

^■i 

6i 

10| 

24 

9 

7 

8| 

6j 

Hi 

10| 

10 

9a 

6i 

lOi 

September  1 

9 

6.1 

% 

7S 

12^ 

11 

10.1 

n^ 

61 

lOJ 

8 

9 

6,-; 

4 

71 

12,| 

11 

lOj 

•''I 

6 

loi 

16 

85 

61 

9| 

9i 

12| 

lu 

lOj 

9| 

6 

10;J 

24 

8| 

7 

9| 

10^ 

12f 

llf 

10| 

9£ 

6 

lOi 

October...  1 

H 

7f 

lOd 

lOt 

12 

11 

lOf 

9a 

6i 

10| 

8 

9 

8 

lli 

H 

12 

111 

10| 

^i 

6f 

11 

16 

9 

8 

10| 

9| 

Hi 

lll 

10| 

H 

7 

11 

24 

9i 

8 

10 

9| 

i4 

iH 

lOi 

4 

7i 

10| 

Kovember  1 

9f 

n 

91 

H 

llj 

11 

lot 

9| 

7 

10 

8 

4 

7 

9,1 

H 

n| 

ii| 

101 

9| 

7 

9| 

16 

10 

7 

n 

H 

"f 

11* 

lOf 

^J 

65 

H 

24 

10 

7 

9.f 

9 

111 

iif 

10 

n* 

&l 

H 

December  1 

11 

7| 

H 

8f 

iif 

Hi 

n 

9^ 

6| 

n 

8 

12t 

8 

H 

8j 

ii-l 

Hi 

n 

9t 

61 

n 

16 

12i 

8 

9k 

8| 

"i 

111 

n 

9| 

6| 

H 

24 

111 

8 

H 

.8$ 

lU 

ii| 

n 

n 

6.1 

H 

Averages — 

9^^ 

8 

loA 

101 

10|< 

h\ 

7| 

BJ-3. 

1  fi 

-TV^; 


A\K^.